MISO is on its way to installing a fourth, 20-year future to inform transmission planning in case supply chains remain unsteady.
During an April 14 teleconference to develop MISO’s first new planning future in six years, RTO staff said they are approximating annual build limitations on new capacity. They also said the Trump administration’s tariff decisions could introduce further instability that makes the fourth scenario more difficult to pin down.
MISO Senior Manager of Policy and Regulatory Planning RaeLynn Asah said the RTO sees “fairly impactful constraints” on all types of generation into the future.
The RTO is revising its trio of 20-year futures scenarios that it relies on to plan transmission. It has said it must incorporate aggressive load growth and create a fourth scenario specifically designed to study the footprint if fraught supply chains continue to impede new generation construction. (See MISO Aims for 4 New Tx Planning Futures in 9 Months and MISO Fields Divergent Calls for Stronger South Planning, IRA Reversal in Tx Futures.)
MISO has tentatively called the new scenario its “Supply Shift” future. It would contemplate continued “supply frictions” that limit the pace of capacity expansion. MISO envisions that load growth might have to be managed through keeping existing generation online and establishing more demand-side resources.
MISO created its current trio of futures in 2019 and last updated them in 2022. A decade ago, the grid operator used as many as 10 different futures to plan long-range transmission.
DL Oates, MISO executive director of markets and grid research, said the RTO is calculating annual capacity build limits by resource type for its fourth future through an assessment of U.S. manufacturing capability, labor constraints and tariff impacts. It multiplied the limits it found by its share of U.S. installed capacity.
“Preliminary results reveal some tension between member-submitted planned units and projected regional supply constraints,” Director of Economic and Policy Planning Christina Drake told stakeholders.
MISO acknowledged that President Donald Trump’s tariffs could add hurdles for generation and said it wants to adopt a wait-and-see approach on whether they have a material impact on generation expansion.
“What we would like to do is let this information settle,” Drake said.
Oates said MISO put its initial assessment together when the country-specific tariff rates were “volatile.”
“This is a shifting situation with these tariffs, so you’ll have to give us a little leeway to figure out what makes the most sense,” Oates said.
MISO does not plan to apply an age-based retirements assumption on its existing fleet for the supply-squeezed future. The RTO would assume some retirement delay announcements.
The Sustainable FERC Project’s Natalie McIntire said it did not seem realistic for MISO to forgo any age-based retirements. She asked it to maintain the same retirement assumptions it applies to the fleet in its three other futures.
“It doesn’t make sense to me to hardwire it into the model,” McIntire said.
Oates said that if members can’t build enough new generation, they may be forced to put off retirements.
“Our working hypothesis is that we’re not going to be able to balance generation and load,” Drake said. She added that MISO will “keep an eye on” whether age-based retirements might make sense in the scenario.
Even with retirement delays, MISO envisions the future would hold a minimum of 60% in emission reductions from 2005 levels, the same as its middle-of-the-road “Stated Policy” future. That would hold unless MISO finds that throttled build rates stand in the way of reducing greenhouse gases. The RTO’s most dynamic, “Higher Load Growth” future estimates a minimum 80% reduction from 2005 emissions levels.
MISO engineer Brad Decker said an enduring labor force pinch can “be a drag” on capacity expansion, especially to stand up labor-intensive solar farms.
Decker said MISO is contemplating tariffs on solar components anywhere from 17 to 37%, not the 145% the Trump administration has publicized.
“China doesn’t really export a lot of solar to the United States. They send materials through intermediate countries,” he explained, adding that MISO would factor in those intermediate countries’ reciprocal tariffs.
Despite wind component sourcing being largely U.S.-based, recent closures of plants that produce blades have shrunk manufacturing capability, Decker said, “posing a risk to scaling wind deployment until domestic production is expanded.”
Decker said small modular reactors likely won’t be a commercial option for at least 10 years.
“A lot of things have to happen between now and then to make these viable,” Decker said. For example, he said, the nuclear industry needs to stand up a market for high-assay low-enriched uranium to fuel the new type of plants. Decker said SMR projects and demonstrations have lurched in a “stop-and-start trajectory, marked by cost overruns and project cancellations due to undersubscribed offtake agreements.”
The Union of Concerned Scientists’ Sam Gomberg said he worried that MISO was being too “rosy” on SMR emergence within a decade and that its estimates would be biased if it relied on the “shiny FAQ sheets” from nuclear developers. He said the nuclear industry has a poor track record in meeting goals and announcements when bringing new capacity online.
Decker said there is a reluctance among gas turbine manufacturers to ramp up production because they remember overcommitting production in the early 2000s. Oates noted growing order backups for General Electric, Siemens, Mitsubishi and other suppliers because of surging, AI-driven demand for firm generation.
The supply crunch future also would consider a small-scale emergence of 12-hour, long-duration battery storage from advanced lithium-ion batteries and up to 100 hours of stored energy from iron-air batteries.
MISO said it won’t factor in other emerging technologies like extended-duration batteries that can last more than 100 hours, green hydrogen, combined-cycle plants with carbon capture and sequestration, and new geothermal technologies. Those likely are too far down the road to be considered in this round of futures, staff said.
The RTO is taking stakeholders’ reactions to its resource assumptions in its fourth future through April 28. It will refine the futures through the fall before using them in 2026 to plan more long-range transmission.