Search
`
November 22, 2024

PJM Power Providers Group (P3)

© RTO Insider LLC
PJM Defends Quadrennial Review Parameters from Generator Protests
PJM defended the proposed capacity auction parameters in its quadrennial review before FERC against two protests from the generation sector.
Low PJM Capacity Prices No Bargain, Coal & Gas Generators Say
Gas- and coal-fired generators said the sharp price drop in PJM’s 2023/24 capacity auction shows the RTO’s long-term reliability is at risk.
© RTO Insider LLC
PJM MOPR Challenge May Set Legal Precedent on FERC Deadlocks
Legal challenges to the PJM MOPR do not just concern the RTO and its capacity market; they could set a precedent for how courts review tie votes at FERC.
Ɱ, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons
Generators Vent Frustration with PJM, FERC to Ohio Senators
PJM stakeholders in the RTO’s generator sector voiced frustration with FERC over recent decisions related to the capacity market to the Ohio Senate.
Paradise Energy Solutions
PJM, Stakeholders Respond to MOPR Replacement Challenges
PJM and its stakeholders continue to jostle over the impact of the proposed replacement for the expanded MOPR as responses continue to be filed at FERC.
PJM
Stakeholder Soapbox: REVing up our Wholesale Power Markets
Glen Thomas, president of PJM Power Providers Group, argues that a re-examination of RTOs' wholesale energy markets is long overdue.
FERC Rejects Ramp Rate Exception in PJM Capacity Rules
FERC rejected the PJM Tariff proposal to exempt some capacity resources from nonperformance charges in capacity performance.
IPPs Challenge Dominion on Proposed Va. Generator
The challenge by P3 and EPSA is the first major test of a 2013 Virginia law requiring utilities to demonstrate that they have considered competitive bids.
Exelon Calls FirstEnergy PPA ‘Grossly Lopsided,’ Says it Can Offer a Better Deal
Exelon has joined the opposition to FirstEnergy's attempts to win guaranteed payments for its Ohio power plants.
PSEG, P3 Group Appeal FERC Rulings on PJM Capacity Rules
PSEG and P3 had disputed PJM’s use of an 8% cost of capital used in cost of new entry calculations.

Want more? Advanced Search