Organization of PJM States Inc. (OPSI)
PJM stakeholders received an update on work by the Offshore Transmission Study Group to coordinate with states more effectively for future wind power.
PJM stakeholders endorsed a proposal from PSEG seeking to create a cost-based calculator to aid in offers made by market sellers.
PJM filed Tariff changes to comply with FERC’s controversial order requiring expansion of the MOPR to new state-subsidized resources.
Facing opposition from regulators and consumer advocates, PJM will suspend an initiative that could tighten fuel requirements for black start resources.
Stakeholders approved the PJM ICC’s changes to the fuel-cost policy after rejecting a proposal state regulators and the Monitor said would create loopholes.
Consumer advocates, industrial customers and state regulators asked FERC to reject PJM transmission owners’ critical infrastructure mitigation plan.
State officials from PJM’s outlying areas expressed concerns about their autonomy after resuming a debate on how they can strengthen their collective role.
Competitive transmission developers made an argument at OPSI’s annual meeting: Supplemental projects undermine regional planning efforts.
PJM's diverse geographic footprint produced divergent opinions on the viability of carbon pricing in the RTO's market at OPSI's annual meeting in Baltimore.
Stakeholders tell PJM's Board of Managers a proposed Tariff attachment from incumbent transmission owners would violate the RTO’s governing documents.
Want more? Advanced Search