PJM riled stakeholders when it rejected manual language approved by more than two-thirds of members on transmission owners’ end-of-life projects.

Federal courts rejected two challenges involving FERC Order 1000: one to Minnesota's ROFR law, and another to MISO's interregional cost allocation.

The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals backed FERC in its revised interpretation of a PJM Tariff provision governing responsibility for transmission upgrades.

PJM stakeholders resoundingly endorsed LS Power’s controversial proposal to bring cost containment measures into the RTO’s transmission planning process.

LS Power’s cost-containment proposal remains largely intact and on schedule to return for a vote at the PJM MRC.

The U.S. Justice Department said that a Minnesota law granting in-state transmission owners rights of first refusal on grid additions is unconstitutional.

FERC instituted proceedings to examine the reactive rate schedules of two MISO generating facilities, one of which is owned by Calpine.

Some PJM generators will have additional time to submit unit-specific exemptions to the MOPR before the RTO’s capacity auction next month.

FERC ruled that transmission projects driven by PJM transmission owners' individual planning criteria are exempt from competitive bidding.

LS Power’s Republic Transmission won FERC approval for incentives to construct MISO’s first competitively bid transmission project.