Search
`
July 23, 2024

D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals

Appellate Court Rejects Challenge to FERC Funding
The D.C. Circuit rejected the claim that FERC is incented to award pipeline certificates because it collects its operating expenses from regulated parties.
Ameren Corp
Courts Uphold Minn. ROFR, MISO Cost Allocation
Federal courts rejected two challenges involving FERC Order 1000: one to Minnesota's ROFR law, and another to MISO's interregional cost allocation.
HSU Builders
DC Circuit Upholds FERC Order on PJM FTRs
FERC sufficiently justified its decision to revise how PJM allocates revenues from transmission congestion, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled.
DC Circuit Rejects Ark. PSC Review of FERC-Entergy Order
The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals denied the Arkansas PSC’s request that it review a FERC order directing Entergy Arkansas to continue sharing settlement proceeds.
DC-Circuit
Court Questions FERC Change on ISO-NE Renewable Exemption
A three-judge panel of the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals questioned FERC over its approval of ISO-NE’s renewable exemption from the MOPR.
Avangrid
ALJ Rules New England Tx Owners’ ROEs not Unjust
A FERC administrative law judge ruled that municipal utilities and commission staff failed to prove that a group of transmission owners’ base return on equity is unjust.
Corval Group
DC Circuit Rejects NorthWestern Reg Service Appeal
The D.C. Circuit upheld FERC’s ruling that the proposal by NorthWestern Energy to recover the costs of providing regulation service was not just and reasonable.
Sabal Trail Transmission
Dem Dissents Show FERC Divide on Carbon
Democratic FERC Commissioners Cheryl LaFleur and Richard Glick have split with the Republican majority over its refusal to consider GHG emissions in two pipeline orders.
Michigan Groups Contest Presque Isle Cost Allocation
The D.C. Circuit Court will hear oral arguments on April 6 in a challenge to a 2016 FERC order that reallocated most costs for the Presque Isle SSR agreement.
Court Backs FERC in Hydro License Dispute
FERC adequately explained why it limited Duke Energy Carolina to a 40-year extension on a hydropower project, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Tuesday.

Want more? Advanced Search