At the first in-person MRC meeting since the pandemic, PJM faced opposition to proposals regarding FERC filings and a change to the capacity offer cap.

Thirty parties submitted comments to the California PUC on a controversial rooftop solar net-metering decision that the commission is revisiting.

PJM put a vote regarding CTR allocation on hold and discussed capital recovery factors as well as its long-term five-minute dispatch and pricing issue.

PJM's Markets and Reliability and Members Committees met to discuss market rules, tariff revisions and elect several new members.

PJM shared its initial response to FERC’s April 16 rehearing orders on the MOPR, which required the RTO to make an additional compliance filing by June 1.

PJM officials told stakeholders that revised calculations show lower floor prices for gas, nuclear and solar generating units under the expanded MOPR.

PJM stakeholders got their first look at the price floors that could be applied for capacity resources under the expanded minimum offer price rule.

In a setback for developers of small power projects, FERC launched a rulemaking to overhaul regulations under the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act.

PJM’s market design and Exelon’s control of local generation allow the company to name its price for capacity commitments in the Chicago area.

PJM stakeholders at last week’s Market Implementation Committee meeting approved two problem statements and issue charges presented by Exelon.