An appellate court ruling on the PJM minimum offer price rule (MOPR) has created disagreement among stakeholders on how to proceed.

PJM’s announcement of plans to recommend more than $400 million in transmission upgrades sparked pushback from American Municipal Power.

Consumer advocates urged Congress to pressure FERC to improve the RTO stakeholder process and reject Energy Secretary Rick Perry’s directive to rescue at-risk coal and nuclear generation.

Discussion at PJM’s Transmission Replacement Processes Senior Task Force has not advanced much since July, but the rhetoric has softened.

More than half of the $24.3 billion in transmission projects in PJM since 2012 were unneeded to comply with reliability requirements, according to AMP.

Following FERC’s technical conference on tensions between wholesale electric markets and policy initiatives, the commission invited comments on five paths.

The DC Circuit Court of Appeals denied eight challenges to PJM’s Capacity Performance rules, potentially cementing changes to the RTO's capacity market.

Panelists at the PJM Grid 20/20 summit discussed the challenges of conflicting state public policy, competing interests and the impact on the RTO's competitive markets.

American Municipal Power plans to propose a problem statement calling for a “holistic assessment” of the PJM Capacity Performance Model.

Stakeholders continue to react coolly to PJM's proposed rules for generator fuel-cost policies, saying they are more punitive than incentivizing.