Search
`
November 8, 2024

MISO Board of Directors Briefs: Dec. 9, 2021

MISO Pulls off 1st Face-to-face Meetings Since Start of Pandemic

ORLANDO, Fla. — MISO Board Week meeting marked MISO’s first plunge into in-person gatherings in nearly two years.

“Isn’t it great to be back in person?” CEO John Bear said in opening the Board of Directors’ meeting Thursday, held at Loews’ Sapphire Falls Resort, near Universal Orlando. “I was excited to put my tie on this morning.”

Organization of MISO States President Julie Fedorchak thanked MISO for “forging ahead” with an in-person meeting. She said the RTO showed it can be done in a “safe and pragmatic way.”

“There’s nothing quite like face-to-face communication,” Fedorchak said.

Board Week drew about 90 stakeholder attendees. MISO also offered a virtual attendance option.

MISO Board Week 2021-12-08 (RTO Insider LLC) Alt FI.jpgSocially distanced attendees at MISO Board Week | © RTO Insider LLC

MISO is charting a return to in-person meetings at its offices in Carmel, Ind.; Eagan, Minn.; and Little Rock, Ark., in late January.

The grid operator plans to reduce meetings of its major stakeholder committees from monthly to eight times per year and rotate which meet in-person, to limit virus exposure. Some stakeholders have misgivings that MISO can accomplish all its market and reliability aims and related FERC filings with just eight meetings per year, four of them in a virtual format. (See MISO Modifies Stakeholder Meeting Schedule.)

Robert Kuzman, MISO’s head of stakeholder relations, called the plan “a good start to get back in person as safely as we can.”

“This is a partnership. We intend to be as efficient as we can while still working through out goals,” Kuzman told the Advisory Committee on Wednesday.

Members asked if MISO would enact vaccination requirements for stakeholders wanting to enter a conference room.

Chief Customer Officer Todd Hillman said MISO is still navigating which requirements in-person meeting attendees must follow.

“Given the 15-state footprint, we’re trying to do right by all,” Hillman said.

Hillman said this week’s event will serve as the “litmus test” for MISO’s on-site meetings. So far, he said, MISO envisions socially distanced attendees, with tables spread apart.

MISO: New Market Platform Running by 2025

MISO said it remains on track for a late 2024 completion for its market platform replacement.

The RTO this year launched its new, one-stop system modeling tool and new market user interface, the nonpublic site market participants use to submit energy bids and offers. It believes it can complete the conversion by late 2024.

MISO is using Siemens smart grid technology to support its new model manager. It plans to cut over to a new method of member data submittal by March and retire its old method of data collection thereafter.

Chief Digital Officer Todd Ramey said MISO will retire both its legacy modeling system and old market user interface in 2022.

Next year, the RTO will work to debut an energy storage participation model on its vintage market platform. It previously said it couldn’t both roll out energy storage offers and focus on the platform replacement. Now it must introduce the storage participation model on both its old and new market platforms. (See MISO: No Choice but to Double Up on 841 Compliance.)

Late next year, MISO anticipates that it will receive its new day-ahead market clearing engine from General Electric.

This year marked the fourth full year of the ongoing swap of the grid operator’s old and rigid platform for a new modular one that can host more complex market offerings.

Board Approves Budget Shaped in part by COVID-19

MISO’s Board of Directors has greenlit a $376.1 million total budget for 2022.

The budget includes a $282.3 million base operating expenses, $37 million in project investments and $56.8 million in other operating expenses.

The 2022 budget is 1% lower than last year’s. MISO executives said pandemic impacts continue to influence budgeting. The RTO originally estimated that it would be largely free of pandemic irregularities in summer 2021.

Like other companies, MISO is contending with cybersecurity issues, supply chain issues, inflation and a tight labor market. CFO Melissa Brown said in fall that MISO was waiting on about $4 million in physical goods, including laptops, tables and new wallboards for the control room, that had yet to be delivered.

Brown also expects that MISO’s higher-than-expected employee vacancy rate will persist into 2022.

She said compared to pre-pandemic levels, MISO is earning a much lower interest rate on its cash, money it usually uses to offset some expenses.

Increasingly severe weather events are also upping spending. Executives said they spent about $2 million over 2021 to answer state- and federal-level questions about MISO’s decision-making and operations during extreme weather events.

Year to date, MISO is $5 million underbudget from its $226 million base operating allotment.

MISO Director Barbara Krumsiek thanked the RTO’s financial team for balancing a budget despite an “extraordinary number of variables.”

MISO Members Weigh Potentially Rough Winter

ORLANDO, Fla. — MISO members this week offered a few tips on how the footprint can weather a tough winter, a day after the RTO elevated the risk level.

The grid operator warned that it’s in for a bumpier season, considering fresh concerns around coal and natural gas fuel assurance and security. (See related story, MISO Sounds Alarm on Potential Winter Fuel Scarcity.)

Todd Hillman 2021-12-07 (RTO Insider LLC) FI.jpgTodd Hillman, MISO | © RTO Insider LLC

“For this winter in particular, we know [awareness around] fuel assurance has been heightened,” MISO Chief Customer Officer Todd Hillman said, noting a doubling of natural gas prices since last year and concerns around coal stockpiles and deliveries.

The U.S. Energy Information Administration recently reported that coal production has sunk to a level not seen since 1978.

Speaking at an Advisory Committee meeting Wednesday as part of MISO Board Week, Hillman said the RTO’s planning futures point to an increased reliance on natural gas going forward.

“In MISO’s view, the number of recent outages is unacceptable,” Hillman said, calling up gas generation performance during mid-February’s arctic blast. (See MISO Underscores Need for RA Action in Winter Storm Review.) “This winter, are we better prepared, or more just bracing for impact?”

MISO’s current generation fleet contains about 80 GW worth of natural gas capacity, 80% of that without firm fuel service. During the February winter storm, the gas fleet experienced a more than 30% forced outage rate.

“Every time we see a weather event that we think is unsurpassed, Mother Nature says, ‘Here, hold my beer,’” MISO President Clair Moeller quipped.

Madison Gas and Electric’s Megan Wisersky said it’s not cost effective for most gas generation operators to secure firm transport.

Stakeholders pointed out that NERC’s new cold weather standards aren’t set to come into effect until April 2023.

“We have a potential reliability situation in front of us that can’t wait,” Cleco Cajun’s Tia Elliott said.

MISO Director Todd Raba asked what the RTO could immediately do to assuage conditions this winter. “There might not be an answer; that’s OK,” he said after a beat of silence.

Travis Stewart 2021-12-07 (RTO Insider LLC) FI.jpgTravis Stewart, COMPP | © RTO Insider LLC

“Other than meditation and prayer,” Hillman jokingly added, prompting stakeholders for suggestions.

Coalition of Midwest Power Producers representative Travis Stewart said MISO could reach out to generators with long lead times to make commitments days in advance.

“We might end up with some uplift, but that’s the cost of reliability. It’s a tough situation, and I think MISO’s markets do an excellent job,” Stewart said.

Clean Grid Alliance’s Beth Soholt said regulators should issue more conservation pleas through television and radio. “It may help us through a shortage or critical time. … I think it just heightens that we’re both going to need the demand side and the supply side,” she said.

“I think we spend so much time taking care of customers that we don’t realize that they have a responsibility to the system. And I think that’s a positive,” Indiana Utility Regulatory Commissioner Sarah Freeman agreed.

But Wisersky said “constant public appeals” might diminish MISO members’ credibility. She also said critical loads like hospitals should obtain on-site backup generation, given the new reality of intermittent generation coupled with knockout weather events.

Beth Soholt John Orr 2021-12-07 (RTO Insider LLC) FI.jpgCGA’s Beth Soholt and Exelon’s John Orr | © RTO Insider LLC

“If we’re honest with our customers, we can’t 100% guarantee that we’re going to be there all the time,” Wisersky said.

Exelon’s John Orr said MISO could address the public about its largely behind-the-scenes work.

“The public gets very little information. … MISO can provide some of this understanding,” he said, noting that the RTO can explain its role and decision-making process and actions taken like rolling blackouts.

Freeman also said the impending introduction of MISO’s seasonal capacity auction and availability-based capacity accreditation will deliver some hard truths on the readiness of MISO’s fleet.

“Like it or not, it will send a signal to generators on how they’re going to be compensated,” she said.

Stakeholders also said MISO should look to generation other than natural gas.

Soholt said that though gas plants are necessary to reliability, she questioned how much natural gas generation the U.S. should build on its way to decarbonization. She said the MISO footprint could use electric storage and more transmission projects to move power around during winter storms.

“How much is in our carbon checkbook to keep building natural gas?” Soholt said. “Natural gas is part of the puzzle, but it’s not the whole answer.”

Consumers Energy’s Kevin Van Oirschot pointed out that several of MISO’s market-based solutions meant to aid reliability are waiting on the new market platform, which will be better able to handle energy storage, distributed energy participation and more demand-side management.

MISO Wraps Annual Transmission Package

ORLANDO, Fla. — MISO said it’s making headway on three transmission planning initiatives, including its 2021 Transmission Expansion Plan (MTEP), long-range transmission portfolio and a joint study with SPP intended to build transmission that can bring more generation online.

On Thursday, the Board of Directors greenlighted 335 new projects worth $3 billion, about a 20% reduction from 2020’s transmission package. (See MISO Tx Expansion Plans Proceeds to Board Vote.)

Aubrey Johnson, MISO’s executive director of system planning, has said the decrease is largely driven by Central planning region transmission owners submitting fewer projects this year. He said projects are scattered evenly across the footprint except for the West region, which continues to experience fewer projects.

“There’s not really any sexy in this [MTEP] … but this is foundational work that needs to be done,” director Mark Johnson said during the board’s meeting.

MISO says that $28.2 billion worth of transmission facilities have gone into service since the first MTEP cycle in 2003. Another $12 billion in projects will be in service by 2024.

Johnson said the billions in upcoming projects illustrate how long it takes to get transmission built. He also said projects from as far back as the 2008 and 2010 MTEPs have yet to be energized.

“Our team is going back to understand better what is going on with these projects,” Johnson said during a Tuesday System Planning Committee (SPC) of the board. He said most projects have been delayed because of budget or design changes.

This year, some members asked that MISO include transmission’s ability to withstand climate change or support clean energy goals in future MTEP planning.

The Environmental Sector asked staff to create “a more inclusive and holistic” transmission planning process that will support the fuel mix transition from fossil plants to renewable resources.

WPPI Energy asked for transfer analyses to SPP and the Tennessee Valley Authority and requested the RTO consider better connections between southern Illinois and southern Indiana.

Johnson has said MISO already considers extreme weather events in planning and it will dial up those efforts.

“We’re trying to expand that further to drive operational insights,” he told the board’s SPC in September.

WPPI Energy’s Steve Leovy said then that MISO can “reasonably expect” repeats of polar vortices that carry load-shed risk. He said he was worried the grid operator’s planning wasn’t doing enough to prevent a repeat of reliability breakdowns during cold snaps.

Midwest Bent for Long-range Projects

MISO Vice President of System Planning Jennifer Curran said staff is still putting together business cases and reliability and engineering analyses for the dozen or so Midwestern projects that could be recommended in the first cycle of long-range transmission projects.

Curran said the RTO is focused on the footprint’s Midwestern portion first because that region is undergoing a much more aggressive clean energy transition than MISO South.

“The needs are much more imminent. In some cases, they are here today,” Curran told the SPC Tuesday. “We operate and plan as one RTO while addressing the need for speed in the North and Central regions.”

She said the regions remain fairly independent of one another partially because of the transmission constraint between the two. Curran acknowledged that MISO could recommend a long-range project to expand its North-South transmission interface, unifying the RTO and widening its benefits spread.

“It’s a little bit chicken and egg,” she said.

Nancy Lange 2021-12-06 (RTO Insider LLC) FI.jpgNancy Lange, MISO director | © RTO Insider LLC

Director Nancy Lange asked how MISO can be sure that project benefits will be contained to the subregion bearing its costs.

“It’s taken me a while to wrap my head around that,” Lange said.

Curran said while there may be some transmission benefits enjoyed by MISO South from the Midwest, they’re inconsequential.

MISO President Clair Moeller said the North-South subregional limit’s energy flow has less transfer capability than the connection between Minnesota and Wisconsin.

“It’s a severe constraint,” he said.

Clean Grid Alliance’s Beth Soholt urged the grid operator to propose projects in a timely manner, noting that utilities and state commissioners are relying on new transmission to make new resource decisions and meet decarbonization goals.

“We were looking forward to seeing [the first] tranche in December,” she said.

MISO originally planned to recommend long-range projects this month as part of MTEP 21. Now, it says it will present a list of projects for approval to the board in June. Though six months tardy, those projects will still be considered under MTEP 21’s banner.

Joint Interconnection Solutions at $2B

SPP and MISO are finalizing a nearly $2 billion portfolio of 345-kV interregional projects that could resolve most constraints along their seam.

The proposals are the result of the grid operators’ joint targeted interconnection queue study, designed to ease their crowded interconnection queues.

MISO still must discern how the projects would interact with any proposed projects under its long-range transmission plan.

MISO executives predicted disagreements over a cost allocation that could assign bills for both generation and load. SPP’s Antoine Lucas said costs could be recovered from new generators as they exit either of the RTOs’ interconnection queues. (See MISO, SPP: Economics Secondary in Joint IC Planning.)

The seams neighbors plan to hold cost-allocation talks on the projects next year. The RTOs have said they would bring projects to their respective boards for approval once they decide on cost allocation.

“I recognize we still have a lot of work to do … but this will hopefully benefit those along the MISO-SPP seam,” Johnson said.

PJM MRC/MC Preview: Dec. 15, 2021

Below is a summary of the issues scheduled to be brought to a vote at the PJM Markets and Reliability Committee and Members Committee meetings on Wednesday. Each item is listed by agenda number, description and projected time of discussion, followed by a summary of the issue and links to prior coverage in RTO Insider.

RTO Insider will be covering the discussions and votes. See next Tuesday’s newsletter for a full report.

Markets and Reliability Committee

Consent Agenda (9:05-9:10)

B. Stakeholders will be asked to endorse proposed revisions to Manual 6: Financial Transmission Rights, conforming to the joint PJM-stakeholder proposal addressing auction revenue rights (ARRs) and financial transmission rights endorsed at the October MRC. The changes were initiated after the GreenHat Energy default in 2018, including a six-month review by an independent consultant and work done at the ARR/FTR Market Task Force. (See Stakeholders Endorse PJM ARR/FTR Market Changes.)

C. Members will be asked to endorse proposed revisions to Manual 10: Pre-Scheduling Operations resulting from a periodic review. The revisions were endorsed at the November Operating Committee meeting. (See “Manual Changes Endorsed,” PJM Operating Committee Briefs: Nov. 4, 2021.)

D. The committee will be asked to endorse proposed Manual 14B revisions resulting from a biennial review. The revisions include the addition of a new section that features details around the incorporation of end-of-life (EOL) needs in the Regional Transmission Expansion Plan, which were part of the tariff attachment M-3 discussions. (See “Manual Endorsements,” PJM PC/TEAC Briefs: Nov. 2, 2021.)

E. Stakeholders will be asked to endorse proposed revisions to Manual 14D: Generator Operational Requirements resulting from a periodic review. The updates featured the addition of several new sections, including one describing eDART modeling requirements. (See “Manual Changes Endorsed,” PJM Operating Committee Briefs: Nov. 4, 2021.)

F. Members will be asked to endorse proposed revisions to attachment DD of the tariff endorsed by the Governing Document Enhancement and Clarification Subcommittee. The revision includes removing section 6.2(c) of the attachment because FERC affirmed PJM’s position that this section of the tariff is no longer applicable and encouraged the RTO to remove this provision as part of its next tariff clean-up filing.

Endorsements (9:10-10:10)

1. Undefined Regulation Mileage Ratio Calculation (9:10-9:30)

The committee will be asked to approve the proposed issue charge to create a new senior task force to re-evaluate the current regulation market design. The issue charge was first presented at the November MRC meeting. (See “Undefined Regulation Mileage Ratio Calculation,” PJM MRC/MC Briefs: Nov. 17, 2021.)

If the MRC approves the issue charge creating the task force, another vote will be taken on the short-term proposals from PJM and the Independent Market Monitor addressing the undefined regulation mileage ratio calculation. Both proposals failed a vote at the October MRC. (See “Regulation Mileage Ratio Fails,” PJM MRC/MC Briefs: Oct. 20, 2021.)

2. Solar-Battery Hybrid Resources (9:30-9:50)

Stakeholders will be asked to endorse the proposed solution and corresponding tariff and Operating Agreement revisions to address market participation by solar-battery hybrid resources. PJM conducted a prefiling meeting with FERC staff in September, and the commission made suggestions to reconfigure the language to increase its chances for approval. (See “Solar-battery Hybrid Resources,” PJM MRC/MC Briefs: Nov. 17, 2021.)

3. Synchronous Reserve Deployment Stakeholder Initiative (9:50-10:10)

The committee will be asked to endorse the proposed solution and corresponding tariff and OA revisions addressing synchronous reserve deployment during a spin event. The proposal was developed from discussions in the Synchronized Reserve Deployment Task Force (SRDTF). (See “Synchronous Reserve Deployment Stakeholder Initiative,” PJM MRC/MC Briefs: Nov. 17, 2021.)

Members Committee

Endorsements (1:30-1:45)

1. Elections (1:30-1:45)

Stakeholders will vote on the proposed sector representatives for the 2021/22 Finance Committee and the 2022 sector whips. The new Finance Committee members include: Susan Bruce, PJM Industrial Customer Coalition (End-use Customer); Jeff Whitehead, Eastern Generation (Generation Owner); Bruce Bleiweis, DC Energy (Other Supplier) and; Alex Stern, PSEG Services (Transmission Owner).

The 2022 sector whips include: Adrien Ford, Old Dominion Electric Cooperative (Electric Distributor); Greg Poulos, Consumer Advocates of the PJM States (End-use Customer); Michael Borgatti, Gabel Associates (Generation Owner); Brian Kauffman, Enel N.A. (Other Supplier); and Sharon Midgley, Exelon (Transmission Owner).

Biden Calls for Federal Procurement of 100% Clean Energy by 2030

President Joe Biden signed a sweeping executive order Wednesday directing the federal government to use carbon-free electricity for its 300,000 buildings and to decarbonize its 600,000 vehicle fleet.

The order requires 100% carbon-free power on a net annual basis by 2030, including 50% 24/7 carbon-free electricity. What that means, a White House fact sheet says, is that “the federal government’s real-time demand for electricity will be met with clean energy every hour, every day, and produced within the same regional grid where the electricity is consumed.”

The policy will “catalyze the development of at least 10 GW of new American clean electricity production by 2030,” according to the fact sheet.

The order seeks to lead by example and leverage the government’s massive purchasing power of $650 billion per year to “protect the environment, drive innovation, spur private sector investment, improve public infrastructure and create new economic opportunity,” it said.

The order sets out a list of emission reduction goals, including:

    • For all federal government buildings: net-zero emissions by 2045, with an interim goal of a 50% reduction by 2032;
    • For all federal government operations: net-zero by 2050, with an interim target of a 65% reduction by 2030; and
    • For federal procurement: net-zero by 2050, via a “Buy Clean” policy that will promote the use of low-carbon construction materials and other low-carbon materials across the supply chain.

The order also calls for electrification of the government’s fleet of 600,000 cars and trucks, requiring that 100% of new acquisitions be zero-emission vehicles (ZEVs) by 2035, with 100% ZEV acquisition for light-duty vehicles by 2027.

It allows exemptions for “any vehicle, vessel, aircraft or non-road equipment that is used in combat support” or for other military purposes. Exemptions are also allowed for government activities and facilities for reasons of national security or to protect intelligence sources or undercover law enforcement operations.

Implementation of the order will be overseen by a new federal chief sustainability officer, appointed by the president, and Biden also hopes to draw in executives from the private and nonprofit sectors for “term-limited appointments to bring innovative perspectives and expertise to federal government.” Key federal agencies will also be required to appoint chief sustainability officers and establish sustainability training for employees.

Funding for implementation, the fact sheet says, will come from the bipartisan infrastructure act, signed into law last month, and the Democrats’ Build Back Better budget reconciliation package passed by the House and now being negotiated in the Senate. Build Back Better includes $20 billion for federal clean energy procurement, according to the White House.

Demand-side Incentives

The order was immediately slammed by Sen. John Barrasso (R-Wyo.), ranking member of the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, who characterized it as an “outrageous and disgraceful” attack on the jobs of U.S. fossil fuel energy workers.

“President Biden’s plan is all about expanding government,” Barrasso said in an email statement. “He is adding a sustainability czar to the White House and every agency. … This is not build back better; it’s another backbreaking move to build bigger bureaucracy.”

Clean energy advocates praised the order, saying it will result in economic growth and job creation while also calling on Congress to finalize passage of the Build Back Better Act.

“This executive order is a critical step to getting the on-the-ground momentum for a complete transition to a decarbonized energy economy,” said Paula Glover, president of the Alliance to Save Energy. She noted that the order references the federal building performance standard now being developed by the White House Council on Environmental Quality for reducing building emissions.

Such standards will “accelerate clean energy research and manufacturing,” she said.

Assuming that building retrofits and vehicle fleet transitions will roll out gradually over a number of years, Harry Godfrey, manufacturing policy lead at Advanced Energy Economy, estimated the order could stimulate business sales of $35 billion to $70 billion by mid-decade, while adding 90,000 to 180,000 jobs in advanced energy manufacturing. The near-term impact on U.S. gross domestic product could be an additional $13 billion to $26 billion, he said.

“As we await the essential clean energy investments contained in Build Back Better to pass Congress, this executive order utilizes the vast purchasing power of the federal government to begin to scale up a large variety of advanced energy technologies and create good jobs in America,” Godfrey said in an email to RTO Insider.

Nancy Ryan, a partner at consulting firm eMobility Advisors, says the commitment to 100% EV acquisition will result in sales of thousands of vehicles per year.

“It’s a commitment going forward that auto manufacturers can take to the bank because they have this commitment to sales,” she said. A more indirect effect is “that it’s a vote of confidence from the federal government because these are working fleets. … It sends a really strong signal that working fleets can be electrified.”

It will also help build out the U.S. supply chain for the thousands of parts that go into electric vehicles, “boosting domestic manufacturing capacity [and] providing another nudge to put the capacity in the U.S. and the jobs that go with it,” she said.

Jason Walsh, executive director of the BlueGreen Alliance, also called out the order’s Buy Clean provisions as a way to “reshore” manufacturing work back to the U.S. “We make steel and cement and other materials in this country in much cleaner ways than some of our biggest competitors, notably China,” he said. “This creates really important demand pull for cleaner building products. We need to create those markets in order to incentivize changes in industry.”

Still another benefit of the order “is the fact that it’s long range, that it is not going to happen overnight,” said Costa Nicolaou, CEO of solar racking manufacturer PanelClaw Inc., an Esdec Solar Group company. “It creates yet another demand-side incentive for manufacturers to set up shop in the U.S., with that demand being in place. And for manufacturers that are already here, it can create a demand-side incentive to increase manufacturing in the U.S. … to scale up our manufacturing even further.”

Filling Skill Gaps

But Ryan said the executive order also creates challenges. For example, electrifying the federal fleet also means building out charging infrastructure, which in turn could put pressure on utility distribution systems, as charging up large fleets creates heavy demand on the grid. Utilities across the country are now looking at different options, such as managed charging programs, to handle that new demand, she said.

The U.S. also may not have the trained workers needed to meet Biden’s ambitious goals, and the executive order in and of itself will not be enough to spur workforce expansion, Walsh said.

“We have skill gaps in certain sectors,” he said. Funds in the Build Back Better Act would allow unions to dramatically increase training and apprenticeship programs to expand the clean energy workforce.

“We need to make clear to a whole new generation of workers that we’ve got to rebuild and repower and retrofit this country,” Walsh said. “And that is a project that is not only enormously important from a climate standpoint, but it also has the potential to be a pathway to career jobs that, if they’re union, can be high quality and family-supporting.”

Youngkin Vows to Pull Va. from RGGI

Governor-elect Glenn Youngkin (R) said Wednesday he will pull Virginia from the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative by executive order once he takes office, but RGGI supporters said he doesn’t have the power to do so.

“RGGI will cost ratepayers over the next four years an estimated $1 billion to $1.2 billion,” Youngkin said in a speech at the annual meeting of the Hampton Roads Chamber of Commerce in Virginia Beach, according to the Richmond Times-Dispatch. “RGGI describes itself as a regional market for carbon, but it is really a carbon tax that is fully passed on to ratepayers. It’s a bad deal for Virginians. It’s a bad deal for Virginia businesses.”

In August, the Virginia State Corporation Commission approved Dominion Energy’s request to recover RGGI costs from ratepayers, which the utility estimated would cost the typical residential customer $2.39/month. Youngkin cited a Dominion filing Monday asking the SCC for permission to increase the surcharge to $4.37/month beginning Sept. 1, 2022.

Authority Questioned

The Democratic-controlled legislature approved a bill to join RGGI in 2020. Youngkin will take office Jan. 15 with a Republican-controlled House of Delegates but with Democrats still in control of the Senate.

As part of the compact, RGGI’s members — including Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island and Vermont — agree to a declining cap on CO2 emissions from the power sector.

The Department of Environmental Quality’s (DEQ) regulation implementing the law capped CO2 emissions for Virginia at 27.1 million short tons for calendar year 2021 and decreases the emissions cap annually by about 3% to reach a 30% reduction from 2020 levels by 2030. Emission sources subject to the rule must obtain and surrender a CO2 emission allowance for every short ton emitted.

“I can assure you there’s a lot of lawyers … that are busy going to the [law] books right now,” Sen. Lynwood Lewis (D), who sponsored the RGGI authorization in the Senate, told The Washington Post.

“I thought Virginia freed itself from an all-powerful monarch in 1776? Perhaps Glenn Youngkin still thinks he’s a CEO and can’t recall his fourth grade separation-of-powers lesson?” tweeted Sen. Scott Surovell (D).

Youngkin’s transition office issued a statement saying the governor has authority to leave RGGI because “Virginia’s participation is governed by a contract agreement, signed by the Department of Environmental Quality and other regulations.”

Cale Jaffe-(UVA Law School) Content.jpgUniversity of Virginia Law School Associate Professor Cale Jaffe | UVA School of Law

University of Virginia Law School Associate Professor Cale Jaffe, director of the Environmental Law & Community Engagement Clinic, told the Virginia Mercury that although the governor will have authority over DEQ — which the legislation directed to manage the program — it would require action by the seven-member Air Pollution Control Board to quit RGGI. “The governor cannot just undo regulations that he might not like via executive order,” Jaffe said.

Democrats currently have a 7-0 majority on the board, and it could take Youngkin three years to win control of it. Two members’ terms expire next June; one expires in 2023; and two more expire in 2024.

Lee Francis, a spokesman for the Virginia League of Conservation Voters, which supports RGGI, agreed with Jaffe’s analysis. “Youngkin’s proposal is grounded in neither fact or law,” Francis told the Times-Dispatch.

Impact Challenged

In addition to legal questions over Youngkin’s authority, the governor-elect’s statement sparked a debate over RGGI’s impact.

Del. Todd Gilbert (R), who will become House speaker, said RGGI’s impact on climate change has been “negligible at best.”

“Virginia was reducing carbon emissions from power plants at a rate comparable to RGGI states before joining the cap-and-trade group,” Gilbert said in a statement. “When a policy costs the public a significant amount of money for no tangible benefit, that policy should be examined carefully and, if practical, rolled back.”

Dominion, which opposed joining RGGI, agreed, saying it continues to believe it “would result in a financial burden on its customers with no real mitigation of GHG emissions regionally.”

“Here in Virginia, we are focused on an all-of-the-above approach to sustainability while keeping our rates below the national average and our service reliability strong,” spokesperson Rayhan Daudani said. “This includes the largest offshore wind project in the nation, transformation of the grid, re-licensure of our nuclear units, energy storage and solar energy, all of which creates jobs and economic opportunity.”

But others said Youngkin’s action would eliminate the source of hundreds of millions in funding for flood preparedness and energy efficiency. Youngkin also told the chamber of commerce Wednesday he would develop a plan to “combat sea-level rise.”

The state is directing 50% of its RGGI auction proceeds to low-income energy-efficiency programs and 45% to a new Community Flood Preparedness Fund. The remainder offsets administrative expenses.

“Regardless of your political party, if you’re a legislator in an area that’s impacted by sea-level rise of just recurrent flooding … you should be very reluctant and cautious in completely devastating that fund,” Sen. Lewis said. “This was going to provide a significant source of revenue.”

Rising Prices

Virginia raised $227.6 million this year in carbon credit auctions this year, including $85.6 million in the quarterly results announced last week. The DEQ had previously predicted the state’s annual proceeds would be between $104 million and $109 million.

Last week’s quarterly auction cleared at $13/ton — the highest price and single largest price jump in the program’s history. (See RGGI Price Hits Record High, Jumps 40% over Last Auction.)

Dominion’s Dec. 6 filing with the SCC estimated the company will need 19 million allowances to cover the emissions from its Virginia-based generation fleet for the year beginning in September. The company said it assumed a weighted average price of $10.53/allowance based on December ICE futures contracts for 2021 and 2022 and the ICF International forward price curve for 2023.

Reaction

Environmental groups and others reacted with alarm to leaving RGGI.

The Northern Virginia Affordable Housing Alliance tweeted, “Saving $54 annually per household is not worth the tradeoff” with the loss of the EE funding.

“This is the wrong decision,” said Virginia Advanced Energy Economy.

Lynnhaven River Now, an environmental group, tweeted that Youngkin’s move would “gut” the flood preparedness fund.

“Hell no! This is unacceptable,” tweeted the Chesapeake Climate Action Network.

U.S. Rep. Don Beyer (D-Va.) tweeted that withdrawing from RGGI “would mean Glenn Youngkin’s first steps as governor of Virginia are steps backwards. He has time to take a closer look at this and reconsider, and that is what he should do.”

Maryland Del. Marc Korman (D) noted that Republican Gov. Larry Hogan attempted to pull Maryland from RGGI and was blocked by the legislature. “We are still in the cap-and-trade program,” he tweeted.

WECC Regional Assessment to Focus on Variability

In a preview of WECC’s 2021 Western Assessment of Resource Adequacy (WARA), Branden Sudduth, the regional entity’s vice president of reliability planning and performance analysis, said the document will aim to provide readers “a better understanding of how increasing variability … is really forcing us to rethink resource adequacy in the interconnection.”

WECC introduced the WARA last year to supplement NERC’s Long-Term Reliability Assessment (LTRA), which Western stakeholders had complained did not capture all the risks that the Western Interconnection faced in 2020, such as rolling blackouts caused by record-setting heat waves in California. (See Western RA Planning Must Change, WECC Says.) This year’s WARA will be published concurrently with the LTRA, which is set to be released next Friday.

Peak hour demand variability across the Western Interconnection (WECC) Content.jpgPeak hour demand variability across the Western Interconnection | WECC

Sudduth told attendees of WECC’s Board of Directors meeting on Wednesday that the WARA seeks to account for variability in setting its projections. While expected peak demand in 2022 is set at around 165 GW (an increase of 15.7% from last year), weather and other factors mean there are a wide range of possible outcomes. A peak of more than 181 GW is a 10% possibility, and there is a 3% chance of a 190 GW peak, which Sudduth linked to a “one in 33 years type of event” similar to the August 2020 heat wave.

The range of possibilities widens out as the WARA’s projections extend into the future, representing the broader scope of possibilities to contend with. At the same time, demand overall is expected to continue shifting upward. By 2031, under the most likely scenario, peak demand will hit around 179 GW, with a 3% chance of reaching as high as 208 GW.

“The underlying load forecasts … will most certainly change over time, as we get closer to the time horizon,” Sudduth said. “But it illustrates the importance of being flexible and responding to any deviations from what we expect, because if we’re fairly good in our forecasting, and come close to that expectation, when the actual hour occurs there’s still a range of 29 GW above and below that will have to be accounted for with real time energy if an extreme weather event occurs.”

Variability Also Seen in Generators

A growing variability in the generation resource mix is also central to the WARA. Sudduth said that solar and wind resources continue to increase their share of the Western Interconnection’s generating fleet. Looking out to 2031, these resources are projected to grow by 101.7% and 25.4% respectively. By contrast, baseload generation is set to increase by 4.5% and hydro by 4.2%.

The behavior of wind and solar under extreme circumstances is another cause for concern. Under a similar projection modeling the most and least likely scenarios, solar and wind were found to experience a much steeper drop-off in availability than baseload. Solar experienced a 42% loss under the 10% likelihood scenario and wind experienced a 94% loss, while baseload dropped by only 12%.

Sudduth said that these projections, which are based on the peak-hour demand and resource availability, only tell part of the story. The full report will delve deeper into the unique behaviors of each resource under the range of possible scenarios.

“When the peak-hour demand is expected, during the middle of the day, these solar resources … are available to meet the growing variability for that hour,” Sudduth said. “The problem, as we’ve seen, is what is available in the evening hours, after the solar resources become less available and demand still remains high. This is why the assessment spends a good portion of the report discussing the risk over all of the hours and not just focusing on the peak demand hour.”

New Mexico Regulators Reject Avangrid-PNM Merger

New Mexico regulators shot down Avangrid’s (NYSE:AGR) proposed $8.3 billion acquisition of PNM Resources (NYSE:PNM) after some officials pointed to Avangrid’s “demonstrated record of poor performance” in other states.

The New Mexico Public Regulation Commission (PRC) voted 5-0 on Wednesday to reject a stipulation — an agreement among parties with an interest in the proposal — thereby sinking the acquisition.

The commission’s order stated that “the potential harms resulting from the proposed transaction outweigh its benefits.”

The two companies had said the acquisition would bring more than $300 million of near-term benefits to PNM customers and the state. That would have included $94 million for customers in rate credits, program funding and forgiveness of unpaid bills.

The companies said the creation of 150 or more long-term jobs would bring $225 million in economic development benefits. And the deal would triple the clean energy electrification plan at PNM, which is New Mexico’s largest electricity provider with 530,000 customers.

Performance Issues

But PRC Chairman Stephen Fischmann said the purported benefits could be counteracted if Avangrid’s performance in New Mexico continues the company’s “demonstrated record of poor performance” in states such as Maine, Connecticut and New York.

“All of those so-called benefits will be soaked up in reliability issues and higher rates — if they perform as we’ve seen elsewhere — quite rapidly,” Fischmann said.

And Fischmann wasn’t convinced that the deal was a one-time opportunity. PNM could find “another suitor that’s more appropriate,” he said, or the PRC or state legislature could take action to accomplish some of the same objectives.

Avangrid said in a statement following the PRC vote that it is evaluating its next steps and hopes to “one day welcome New Mexico into the Avangrid family.”

Conservation and community groups on Wednesday lamented the loss of $300 million in benefits to the state, calling the commission’s decision unfortunate.

Cara Lynch, attorney for the Coalition for Clean Affordable Energy, said the agreement would have provided hundreds of millions of dollars in shareholder funds for customers and the environment.

“No other legal avenue exists to extract shareholder dollars for New Mexicans to conserve energy in their homes, to New Mexicans with arrearages due to the pandemic, or to provide valuable apprenticeships,” Lynch said in a release.

Nonprofit Fights Acquisition

New Energy Economy (NEE), a Santa Fe-based nonprofit, argued in PRC filings that Avangrid and its Northeast affiliates racked up more than $63 million in fines and violations over the last five years. NEE said reliability and performance issues at Avangrid subsidiaries in Maine, New York and Connecticut have resulted in regulatory actions.

NEE said Avangrid’s experience in renewables is primarily with wind power and that the company has little experience in solar.

In addition, NEE accused Avangrid of violating discovery rules in the PRC proceeding by giving incomplete responses and designating as confidential more information than necessary. The company said it acted in good faith in responding to discovery requests. Still, a PRC hearing examiner recommended $10,000 in sanctions against Avangrid and PNM as a result of the discovery issues.

The order that the commission approved on Wednesday also expressed concern about Avangrid and its parent company Iberdrola “in light of the ongoing criminal investigation in Spain involving high level officers.”

Some of the concerns regarding Avangrid were aired during the PRC’s meeting on Dec. 1. (See Bid-rigging Allegation Clouds Avangrid Bid for PNM.) PNM Resources and Avangrid hosted a news conference the next day to discuss the issues.

Avangrid has “always stressed the highest levels of ethics and accountability in everything we do,” said Robert Kump, the company’s deputy CEO.

In addition, Kump noted that Iberdrola was named one of the most ethical companies in the world for the last seven years in a row.

The companies also acknowledged in filings that Avangrid subsidiary Central Maine Power (CMP) experienced service issues between 2016 and 2019, but that the issues have been addressed.

“Avangrid and CMP moved quickly to add resources, implement system changes, and promote new leaders to improve customer service,” the companies said.

Since then, “CMP has addressed these issues and has satisfied, and continues to satisfy and exceed the Maine Public Utilities Commission’s stringent customer service metrics,” they added.

LADWP on ‘Crash Course’ to Generate with Green Hydrogen

The largest municipal utility in the U.S. is betting big on generating electricity with green hydrogen out of sheer necessity, its top official said this week.

“We are on a crash course to recreate a new power system in Los Angeles, a new generating system to feed the electrical grid that we have, and we see green hydrogen as the solution to do that, and the only way that we know to accomplish the reliability that we need,” Martin Adams, general manager of the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (LADWP), said Monday.

Adams was speaking at the Building Hydrogen Corridors in the Pacific West for a Carbon Neutral Future conference, a two-day event hosted by the New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO) of Japan and the Japan External Trade Organization (JETRO).

The virtual conference convened panelists to discuss how governments, utilities, companies and other interested stakeholders could collaborate to accelerate adoption of green hydrogen as a fuel source throughout the western U.S. and Canada. It also provided a forum for Japan-based manufacturers to showcase their own efforts to bring green hydrogen into the mainstream for utility, industrial and transportation applications.

LADWP already has a major hydrogen project in the works with the conversion of the coal-fired Intermountain Power Plant (IPP) in Delta, Utah, into an 840-MW combined cycle natural gas-fired facility capable of burning a fuel mixture consisting of 30% hydrogen when it opens in 2025, transitioning to 100% by 2045. In partnership with Mitsubishi, which will provide the turbines for the new plant, the project will also include on-site production of green hydrogen, as well as storage of the fuel in massive salt caverns adjacent to the site. (See ‘Ecosystems’ Needed to Drive Green Hydrogen Growth.)

“In Delta, Utah, we have a very unique situation,” Adams said. “We have plenty of land for electrolysis; we have the setup for all the systems we need; we have plenty of water supply to convert the hydrogen. And we also have an underground salt dome rock formation, which allows us a really unique opportunity to store hydrogen.”

But a study published last March by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory showed that LADWP will require a large amount of dispatchable generation located much closer to home as it sets out to hit the city’s 100% renewable target — about 2,500 MW within the Los Angeles Basin.

The utility currently operates four gas-fired plants in the basin rated at a combined 3,400 MW of capacity. Three of the plants — Scattergood, Haynes and Harbor — sit on the coast and must be repowered or rebuilt to meet a California rule requiring power producers to phase-out plants that rely on ocean water for once-through cooling by 2029. Additionally, the Los Angeles City Council voted in September to require that 100% of the electricity used in the city be carbon-free by 2035, establishing a 2030 deadline for replacing the gas-fired plants.

That “confluence” of objectives dictates LADWP’s move away from natural gas to burning cleaner fuels, Adams said.

“And the only solution that we know and we see at this time is to burn hydrogen, and for us that means burning green hydrogen,” he said. The combined hydrogen power projects in the L.A. Basin would “dwarf” the IPP project in scope, he added.

“Those four power plants will have to have a number of power generating units that burn green hydrogen in the future in order to have a sustainable electrical grid and provide the kind of power supply that the city needs for the future and have a green supply,” Adams said.

While IPP, with its massive storage capability nearby, provides the “perfect setup” for a large-scale hydrogen project, Adams said those features can’t be transplanted into L.A.’s urban environment, raising questions about the kind of infrastructure needed to support hydrogen-fueled generation in the basin, and whether hydrogen must be shipped to the plants as a gas, liquid or ammonia.

“So we need to decide, what is the delivery pipeline going to look like? And where are we going to hold [the hydrogen]? … I’m going to generate power using hydrogen; I don’t want to be in the business of generating hydrogen. I like to deal with it and handle it as little as possible. Because right now, I bring in natural gas, and I just have a service connection. I handle as little as possible,” Adams said.

“I did not know that in the L.A. Basin, there’s 60 miles of hydrogen piping, running in the harbor area between certain vendors and oil refineries. How do we parlay into that? How do we get that hydrogen to become green hydrogen, instead of the gray hydrogen it is today? How do we get green hydrogen? And how do we build out that system? How do we take advantage of that infrastructure?”

Lower-cost Solution?

Sharing the panel with Adams was Peter Sawicki, regional director of sales and marketing at Mitsubishi Power Americas. Sawicki said Mitsubishi has performed its own study modeling the requirements of a net-zero grid by using the same energy market simulation software that utilities rely on to develop their integrated resource plans.

According to Sawicki, Mitsubishi “couldn’t get the [net-zero] model to converge without the use of hydrogen.” The alternative would require a “massive” amount of renewable generation subject to “massive” curtailment at times of oversupply.

The study concluded that a “pro-hydrogen” scenario results in a more efficient buildout of the grid, Sawicki said.

“We see what comes out to be a 20% lower system cost to reach net zero, which is kind of counterintuitive, when people think of hydrogen as being a very expensive infrastructure,” he said. “That is true, but if we think about the massive overbuild that would be needed to reach [zero carbon] without the use of hydrogen as a long-duration storage medium, that system cost winds up actually being more expensive.”

Adams thinks hydrogen’s day has arrived, but industry and the general public still need convincing.

“I get challenged all the time. People say, ‘Well, we’ve heard of hydrogen before; it’s come around in years past.’ I think we believe that we’re at the tipping point, that the momentum has changed, and this time it’s for real.”

Robust Renewables Outlook Puts Supply Chain Issues in New Light

Steady past growth and a strong demand outlook for renewables in the U.S. are revealing the weak points in the sector’s supply chain.

While the U.S. hit renewable energy deployment records in each of the last three years, that growth was contingent on an import-heavy supply chain, Raymond Long, senior vice president of external affairs for Clearway Energy said Wednesday.

And the outlook for a domestic supply of renewable energy components isn’t getting better. For example, of the estimated 25 GW of solar that is slated to come online in 2022, only 5 GW worth of solar panels will come from U.S. manufacturing, Long said.

“We still have no choice but to source panels from overseas and import them to the U.S.,” he said during the American Clean Power Association’s CLEANPOWER 2021 conference in Salt Lake City.

Under the Biden administration’s target to reach net-zero energy by 2035, Long said the solar industry needs to deploy 75-100 GW every year for the next 15 years.

“As exciting as that is for the industry … it’s really a daunting thing to think about how we are going to meet that with pressure to buy American and not to import panels,” he said.

Trump-era tariffs designed to bolster U.S. manufacturing have not been effective, and the Build Back Better Act includes targeted incentives to grow domestic renewables supply. But Long said it’s not possible to overturn the current supply chain paradigm with “the flip of a switch.”

“You have to find the right ways to do it and give it the right amount of time,” he said.

The pandemic has highlighted unforeseen glitches across global supply chains, while other solar-specific challenges also cropped up this year. In August, an anonymous group of solar manufacturers asked the U.S. Department of Commerce to investigate Chinese solar panel companies for potentially avoiding anti-dumping duties. The department has since declined to launch an investigation, but Long said the industry is still “dealing with the impacts” of the petition.

And in June, the Department of Homeland Security began detaining silica-based product imports from China-based Hoshine Silicon and its subsidiaries over human rights concerns. Silica is used in solar panel production.

The review process for detained shipments is “hampered,” Long said, and the situation needs to improve to avoid project delays next year.

“We’ve heard from other developers in the sector that solar panels aren’t making it to projects that are under construction now,” he said. “In 2022, with all the projects that are being built, if things stay the way they are, panels will not make it to those projects on time.”

The department’s order applies to materials, such as polysilicon, that are derived from silica-based products. China is responsible for 80% of the world’s polysilicon production, said Josh Skogen, senior vice president of procurement at AES. The energy transition, he said during the conference, is really a transition from a fuel-intensive system to a minerals-intensive system.

Minerals needed for solar, wind and storage components, for example, come from a small number of countries with a concentrated production rate. U.S. reliance on more renewable technologies is introducing new trade restrictions, trade patterns and geopolitical concerns, Skogen said.

“With that concentration, if there is a trade restriction or a geopolitical concern or a pandemic, like we’ve experienced, the volatility and the supply of that feedstock, and the upstream effects that has on the construction of new projects, is exacerbated,” he said.

Flexibility is Key

Current supply chain challenges have been “overwhelming,” Art Fletcher, executive vice president of construction for Invenergy, said during the conference.

While the company has managed those challenges, he said, they’ve been a “significant strain” on resources at an “all-new level.”

Staying nimble is a necessity for executing projects now, Fletcher said.

“Previously, we would know [two years out] that we were using a certain wind turbine or a certain battery package or a certain solar package,” he said. “Unfortunately, with the supply chain challenges we’ve had, there’s a great uncertainty in what we might actually be able to source either domestically or internationally.”

The company must plan projects differently from an engineering perspective.

“We have to go back sometimes a year to what we were working on and reevaluate what that technology is and how it applies to our land, our permits and everything else,” he said.

On the supplier side, turbine manufacturer Vestas has been equally challenged by global supply chain issues, and it also relied on flexibility to make it through.

Vestas’ global supply chain allows the company to shift between countries under new tariffs or when geopolitical changes occur that it did not anticipate, said Noga Vilan, director of supply chain planning for Vestas Americas.

The supply chain lessons of the last two years will allow Vestas to improve itself in the next decade, she said, adding that the company’s ability to do that will be tied to project volume.

At Vestas, the long-term vision to build value in the industry is to create a “whole ecosystem supply chain,” Vilan said.

That means the company will execute wind turbine installations while also ensuring local roads are better and communities have more jobs, she said.

“We truly believe that creating renewable energy is not just having cleaner energy and cheaper electricity when you turn on the lights,” she said. “It’s creating meaningful life, and we can do much more than what we’re doing today.”