John C. Citrolo, markets director for PSEG Energy Resources and Trade and a regular attendee at PJM stakeholder meetings, died Aug. 2. PJM’s Market Implementation Committee marked his passing with a moment of silence at its meeting last week.
Known to his friends as “Jay,” the 49-year-old Citrolo lived in Southampton, N.J., with his wife Sandi and his dogs, Jada and Mya.
He was a graduate of Upsala College, where he played football, and earned a master’s degree in economics at Temple University. Prior to joining PSEG, his career in the power industry included jobs with the State of Delaware, Conectiv Energy, Calpine and Net2000. He was also the co-founder and co-owner of the Medford Gym in Medford, N.J.
Surviving, in addition to his wife, Sandra Grungo Citrolo, are his father, John Citrolo Sr.; his stepmother Sally; his sister, Mary E. “Betsy” Citrolo; mother- and father-in-law, Sandra and Burt Roff; as well as six nieces and nephews. His mother, Beverly Young, died in 2013.
Memorial contributions in John’s name can be made to Joe Joes Place, an animal rescue organization, at 7 Tidswell Ave., Medford, NJ 08055.
PJM’s biggest news story of the year may well come Friday with the release of the results from last week’s capacity market auction.
The 2018/19 Base Residual Auction – the results of which are due Friday afternoon — will be the first under the new Capacity Performance rules approved by FERC in June. The rules increase incentives for high-performing resources and penalties for poor performers, largely eliminating force majeure provisions under a “no excuses” policy.
The auction, which ran from Aug. 10-14, was postponed from May due to delays in winning FERC approval.
The changes will be phased in beginning with the 2018/19 and 2019/20 delivery years, when PJM hopes to make at least 80% of its procurement CP resources, with the remainder “Base Capacity” subject to lower performance expectations. The transition will be complete for 2020/21, when PJM expects 100% of capacity to be CP.
It accepted PJM’s prediction that resource performance will continue to worsen without changes, as the RTO sees much of its coal fleet retire, replaced largely by natural gas-fired generation. The majority rejected the arguments of opponents who said the changes were not necessary because generator performance improved last winter following more modest changes, including testing of seldom-used units.
Chairman Norman Bay dissented, saying the proposal will continue to allow generators to profit from poor performance while potentially saddling ratepayers with billions in excessive capacity costs annually.
Friction with Stakeholders
The ruling was followed by a testy, six-hour stakeholder meeting over CP manual changes June 18 that left some stakeholders complaining that the RTO had not thought through all the details. Criticism continued in July, as some members warned PJM officials that the way the RTO plans to calculate CP could lead generators to ignore dispatch instructions to avoid penalties. (See PJM Members: Capacity Performance Penalties May Hurt Dispatch Discipline.)
FERC issued a procedural order July 28 saying it needed more time to consider rehearing requests of its June 9 order from state regulators, consumer advocates, generators and the Independent Market Monitor.
Higher Costs
According to a cost-benefit analysis released in October by PJM and the Monitor, CP could cost ratepayers as much as $6 billion over the next four years, with long-term costs of as much as $700 million annually.
PJM says the increased performance will result in increased monthly capacity costs of about $2 to $3 per household beginning in 2018, assuming average winter and summer weather. In a year of extreme weather, officials say, it would result in net savings because the increased capacity costs will be more than offset by reduced energy costs.
For More Information
PJM’s Board of Managers filed the Capacity Performance proposal in December to increase the reliability expectations of capacity resources with a “no excuses” policy that would result in larger capacity payments and higher penalties for non-performance. (See What You Need to Know about PJM’s Capacity Performance Proposal.)
FERC’s June 9 order required several significant changes from PJM’s Capacity Performance proposal. (See What is Changing in PJM’s Proposal?)
PJM’s Independent Market Monitor has called on FERC to settle a dispute between PJM and a transmission developer, saying the RTO’s unwillingness to release relevant files is unfair to the developer and impeding the Monitor’s own attempts at resolution (EL15-79).
TransSource — not to be confused with Transource Energy, a partnership of American Electric Power and Great Plains Energy — asked FERC in June to order PJM to provide the company with data showing how the RTO calculated network upgrade costs in its system impact studies for several of its auction revenue rights requests. (See Transmission Developer: PJM TOs Inflating Upgrade Costs for ARRs.)
PJM responded by asking FERC to dismiss the complaint. The RTO insisted it had provided TransSource with all the relevant data, and that the specific files that the company is requesting were not used in the cost calculations. These files, called PLS.CADD, are held by transmission owners and are “highly confidential” according to PJM.
The Market Monitor told FERC in an Aug. 6 filing that it “is concerned that the primary defense raised by PJM is that the complainant does not have the facts sufficient to support its case, and that the claims amount to overly broad generalizations, when the complainant’s case is primarily based on TransSource’s claims that they have not been provided adequate facts to assess the determination to increase assigned costs to TransSource.”
TransSource maintains that under the PJM Tariff and the Federal Power Act, it has a right to the PLS.CADD files. While the Monitor did not comment on specific Tariff or legal provisions, it agreed that TransSource should have access to the files.
“The complaint does not request substantive relief, but only that what appear to be reasonable requests for additional information be answered before TransSource is required to make financial commitments that TransSource is not be able to make unless and until those question are answered,” the Monitor said. It also said the fact that the files are held by the TOs, and not PJM, “is a major obstacle to a resolution.”
The Monitor said it would prefer an administrative law judge to handle hearing or settlement proceedings. In a filing last week, TransSource said it supported this idea.
TransSource “persists in making overly broad and vague accusations such as PJM ‘refused’ to provide any data,” PJM said. “Such accusations deny the commission a true and accurate picture as to exactly what data and assumptions TransSource was denied.” PJM also said that it had informed the company that if PLS.CADD files had been used in the studies, then the RTO would have ordered their release.
PJM also argued that the company lacked evidence for its other accusations, including that transmission owners Public Service Electric and Gas, PPL, Jersey Central Power & Light and Delmarva Power & Light intentionally inflated the costs of the network upgrades to make it impossible for TransSource to secure funding for them.
SunEdison has sold Dominion Resources a 50% interest in its 420-MW Four Brothers solar project in Utah.
Under the terms of the joint venture, Dominion will invest about $500 million to get 50% of the project equity and 99% of the federal and state tax benefits. SunEdison has secured necessary funding to complete the rest of the estimated $650 million facility. It is scheduled to be operating by mid-2016.
The project’s output is under contract with a 20-year power purchase agreement with Berkshire Hathaway Energy’s subsidiary PacifiCorp.
Overbuilt, We Energies Seeks to Sell Excess Capacity Elsewhere in Wisconsin
We Energies wants Wisconsin regulators to force two other utilities in the state to buy its excess power rather than building new gas-fired generating plants for $1.2 billion.
One of the utilities in need of new generation, Alliant Energy’s Wisconsin Power & Light, has applied for state approval to build a $750 million natural gas-fired plant in Beloit. Alliant said We Energies and its parent, WEC Energy Group, should have submitted its plan earlier and WEC now seeks to force a process in which it would be sole bidder to supply Alliant. The other utility seeking to build new generation is Wisconsin Public Service, which is owned by WEC.
We Energies said selling power to Alliant and WPS would allow the neighboring utilities to avoid the cost of construction and could provide We Energies customers some rate relief by selling excess power. The state Citizens Utility Board and the Wisconsin Industrial Energy Group issued a joint statement saying the proposal was worth considering.
Ameren Withdraws Application for 2nd Callaway Nuclear Reactor
Ameren has withdrawn its application from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission for a second reactor at its Callaway Energy Center plant in Callaway County, Mo., after years of delay.
Ameren said its decision to abandon the project was based on its assessment of long-term capacity needs, declining costs of alternative generating technologies and the regulatory framework in Missouri. CEO Warner Baxter told analysts during the company’s second-quarter earnings call that it continues “to believe nuclear power must be an important clean energy source for our company and country.” Callaway was recently granted a 20-year license extension.
Ameren first filed its application for a second unit in 2008. The company teamed with Westinghouse in 2012 for a small modular nuclear reactor that would be about a fourth of the size of a conventional plant. After being passed over twice for federal grants, Ameren said it was “stepping back” from the project at the end of 2013.
Minnesota Co-ops Combine to Acquire Alliant Territory
Nobles Cooperative Electric, Federated Rural Electric and 10 other electric distribution cooperatives completed their acquisition of Alliant Energy’s electric service territory in southern Minnesota.
The acquisition transfers about 43,000 Minnesota Alliant Energy accounts to local electric cooperatives. According to Rick Burud, general manager of both Nobles Cooperative and Federated Rural, the transfer is a first of its kind. “It is a very unique situation for electric cooperatives to have the opportunity to purchase service territory from investor-owned utilities,” he said.
In 2013, the 12 cooperatives formed Southern Minnesota Energy Cooperative as the single point of contact for the purchase of electric service territory from Alliant. The acquisition process was approved by the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission, Iowa Utilities Board and FERC.
ERCOT’s Board of Directors selected general counsel Bill Magness to become the RTO’s next president and CEO. Magness, who is also currently senior vice president for governance, risk and compliance, will succeed Trip Doggett, who announced in June he plans to retire next year as president and chief executive. Doggett has been CEO since 2010.
“Bill’s leadership skills, as well as his significant executive experience at ERCOT, have positioned him to successfully lead ERCOT through an era of evolving changes in the energy industry,” ERCOT Board Chair Craven Crowell said. “He also understands the importance of — and is committed to — strong working relationships with stakeholders, the Public Utility Commission of Texas and the Texas Legislature.”
World-Renowned Auction Expert Joins ERCOT’s Board of Directors
Cramton
ERCOT approved Peter Cramton as the new independent member of its Board of Directors. An economics professor at the University of Maryland at College Park and a widely recognized expert in energy auctions, Cramton succeeds Michehl Gent, whose third and final term concluded in May.
The ISO said Cramton has played a lead role in the design and implementation of electricity and gas auctions in North America, South America and Europe since 2001. Cramton also chairs Market Design Inc., an economics consultancy that focuses on the design of auction and matching markets. “Peter is a pioneer in his field, and we are delighted to welcome him to ERCOT’s Board of Directors,” ERCOT Board Chair Craven Crowell said in a press release.
The Public Utility Commission of Texas, which oversees ERCOT, approved Cramton’s appointment to the board. State law mandates the board include five unaffiliated members, from which the chair and vice-chair are chosen.
Four Corners Resumes Operation Following Bomb Scare
Operations returned to normal at New Mexico’s Four Corners Power Plant last week following the discovery of three suspicious devices in one of the plant’s three active units.
An FBI spokesman said the three devices, each a steel pipe with its ends capped, were hollow and did not contain explosive material. The devices’ discovery Aug. 3 led to an evacuation of all plant personnel. Operations did not resume until the following day.
The FBI said there was no indication the devices were related to explosions at two Las Cruces churches Aug. 2.
CFO Russ Stidolph told Curry County, N.M., commissioners Aug. 4 that Tres Amigas has posted $8.2 million in collateral to begin making necessary upgrades for the Public Service Company of New Mexico grid.
Stidolph said Tres Amigas is working with land owners to acquire rights of way. He said he expects “significant progress” to be made with land owners in the next months.
Arkansas Electric Cooperatives Inc. announced Aug. 12 that its Today’s Power subsidiary has reached an agreement to provide a 1-MW solar array for Tri-County Electric Cooperative of Hooker, Okla. The facility is projected to generate more than 50 million kWh over its 25-year useful life.
AECI, a utility service cooperative owned by 17 Arkansas electric cooperatives, launched Today’s Power in February to provide renewable energy solutions, energy efficiency programs and emergency backup generators for large commercial, industrial or utility customers. Today’s Power has an exclusive distribution agreement to promote and sell tenKsolar products in Arkansas, Tennessee, Mississippi, Louisiana, Oklahoma and Missouri.
South Plains II is expected to generate 1,200 GWh of energy each year, enough to power more than 90,000 homes and avoid the emission of 2 billion pounds of carbon dioxide. Hewlett-Packard plans to purchase 112 MW of the project’s capacity to power its Texas-based data centers. The remaining 188 MW of capacity will be sold to an affiliate of Citigroup, which is financing the project.
Hunt Consolidated Energy agreed to pay $19 billion for the transmission business Oncor, the jewel of Energy Future Holdings. Energy Future is selling Oncor as part of its bankruptcy proceeding.
Energy Future, formerly TXU, selected Hunt Consolidated among many other offers. Hunt Consolidated has been in the energy business in Texas for more than 80 years.
As part of the bankruptcy restructuring, Energy Future will spin out its competitive businesses — TXU Energy and Luminant — and turn over Oncor to Hunt Consolidated, which will manage the company out of the current Dallas headquarters. The deal still needs several legal and regulatory approvals. Oncor has more than 3 million customers in North and West Texas.
FirstEnergy has expanded the roles of several corporate executives in an effort to “support the company’s focus on customer service and cost management.”
Among those promoted are James Lash, president of FirstEnergy Generation, who will also serve as executive vice president of FirstEnergy. CFO James F. Pearson will see a bump up from senior vice president to executive vice president. Charles Lasky, vice president of fossil fleet operations, will shift to the human resources department as a senior vice president.
FirstEnergy also filled several vacant positions. Trent Smith, vice president of sales and marketing for FirstEnergy Solutions, will serve as supply chain vice president for the parent company, filling a void left by Gary Benz, who was named senior vice president of strategy in June. Gary Grant will take over as vice president of customer service at FirstEnergy Utilities, replacing Ronald Green, who is retiring after 38 years with the company.
The coal-fired Brunner Island power plant in York County, Pa., will soon be burning natural gas to help power its three generators.
New owner Talen Energy says it will spend $100 million to convert the plant to dual fuel, which includes building a 3-mile pipeline to tap into an interstate line. A Talen spokesman said the plant would still burn coal, but he could not say how much power would be generated by either fuel.
While Brunner Island is often listed among the dirtiest plants in the U.S., Talen said the plan isn’t being driven by the Environmental Protection Agency’s Clean Power Plan or any other environmental regulations. “The real driver behind this project is the long-term sustainability of that plant and 200 jobs,” spokesman Todd Martin said. The project is expected to be completed by spring 2017.
Bechtel Breaks Ground on Natural Gas Plant in Virginia
Construction company Bechtel is building a natural gas-fired plant in Leesburg, Va., which will generate enough power for 800,000 homes in Virginia and D.C.
The Stonewall Energy Center is expected to cost about $800 million and be completed by mid-2017. Bechtel has sold its interest in the project to Panda Power Funds, now the plant’s sole owner. A Panda Power spokesman said no new pipelines or transmission lines will be needed and that the plant will use the latest emissions-controlling technology.
AEP Promotes Haynes to SVP of Strategic Initiatives
Haynes
American Electric Power has promoted Stephan Haynes, vice president of strategic initiatives, to senior vice president of strategic initiatives. Haynes will continue his role as chief risk officer.
“Steve and his team have done an incredible job identifying, analyzing and developing mitigation strategies for risk events that could impact AEP,” CFO Brian Tierney said “He also has helped the company evaluate strategic opportunities to grow our business and to move our transmission joint ventures forward.”
Haynes has a bachelor’s in business systems analysis from Harding University and an MBA from Ohio State.
Dispute’s Resolution Sets Up Closure of New Mexico Plant’s Units
Public Service Company of New Mexico and four other parties signed an agreement to end their dispute over the future of the coal-fired San Juan Generating Station in northwestern New Mexico. The settlement potentially paves the way for the state Public Regulation Commission to approve PNM’s plan to shut down two of the power plant’s four generating units to meet federal haze regulations.
Environmental, clean energy and consumer organizations had opposed PNM’s proposals for San Juan, largely because the utility and its parent firm, PNM Resources, wanted to acquire 197 MW of excess coal generation that will be left behind in one of the two remaining generators. The new accord ends that opposition, allowing PNM to take ownership of the additional 197 MW to keep San Juan’s two remaining units fully operational.
The agreement must still be reviewed in a public hearing, now scheduled for Sept. 30, before the PRC makes a final decision.
El Paso Electric has filed a rate increase request with the Public Utility Commission of Texas on Aug. 10 that would add $8.41 to an average residential customer’s monthly bill. The new rates would go into effect Sept. 14, although EPE said a months-long rate case might delay imposition of the increase until the second quarter of 2016.
EPE filed a separate rate case with the New Mexico Public Regulation Commission in May, asking for about $8.6 million that would result in a 9% increase to the average monthly residential bill for its customers in that state. Any approved increase in New Mexico would go into effect in 2016, officials said.
Utility officials said they are seeking to recover some of their infrastructure costs for the El Paso Montana Power Station and its transmission lines and a new operations center. The first two generating units at the Montana station cost about $206 million, with another $20 million for the transmission lines and $40 million for the operations center.
When the Clean Power Plan was released last year, New York’s grid operator was concerned with its impact despite the state’s membership in a regional carbon trading regime.
Changes made in the final plan based on input from grid operators — combined with a more pronounced shift toward gas generation and renewables in New York as new power plants move closer to completion and the state has committed another $1.5 billion for clean energy over the next decade — seem to have allayed those fears.
“Based on our initial review, it appears EPA responded positively to major concerns regarding reliability in the draft rule, and that the final rule is generally favorable to New York,” NYISO spokesman David Flanagan said.
EPA also added a reliability safety valve and a requirement that states seek grid operators’ reliability assessments on their implementation plans.
“A reliability safety valve will allow a state to propose a modified emission standard for an affected generator for a temporary period of time to address an unforeseen emergency situation that threatens reliability,” Flanagan said.
In June, the state committed to reducing all greenhouse gas emissions by 40% from 1990 levels, cutting energy consumption in buildings by 23% from 2012 levels and getting half of the state’s energy from renewable sources.
While New York is ahead of most other states, it will have to make decisions on retirements of aging, fossil fuel plants and the future of the Indian Point nuclear facility.
New England
The New England states — members of the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, along with New York — are generally well ahead of the targets set in the Clean Power Plan, in some cases by several years. EPA has recognized RGGI as a model compliance tool.
Connecticut, Massachusetts and New Hampshire have less stringent goals for the 2022 interim period, reflecting what EPA calls a “smoother glide path.” However, those states have more stringent goals by 2030 compared to other states.
Connecticut’s interim goal is 899 lbs/MWh and its 2030 goal is 786 lbs/MWh; Massachusetts is at 956 and 824, respectively; Rhode Island, 877 and 771; and New Hampshire comes in at 1,006 and 858.
Maine no longer has any of the coal-burning power plants considered the primary target of the emissions reductions. Under the goals, Maine would have to reduce its carbon dioxide emissions per megawatt-hour of electricity by 10.8% by the year 2030.
Vermont is one of three states, along with Alaska and Hawaii, exempted from the rules. Vermont’s largest source of electricity is hydropower imported from Canada. The Green Mountain State has some in-state dams and two wood-burning power generators.
The Union of Concerned Scientists issued a report last week that said the Northeast states are among 20 states that have made commitments (including carbon caps, coal plant closures and mandatory renewable electricity and energy efficiency standards) that put them more than halfway toward meeting their 2030 targets. Sixteen states are likely to surpass the targets, the group said.
FERC last week approved bylaw changes allowing SPP to add up to three seats to the RTO’s Board of Directors.
The revisions also incorporate corresponding modifications to quorum and voting requirements, effective Aug. 15.
SPP President Nick Brown and Board Chair Jim Eckelberger.
SPP’s board is currently comprised of seven independent directors, including President Nick Brown. The RTO says expanding its board to up to 10 persons would “foster a measure of flexibility” and further director succession planning, “with due consideration given to director tenure, knowledge sharing and risk management.”
SPP’s Corporate Governance Committee recommended the revisions in April, when they were approved by the Members Committee.
Brown said last month the governance committee will be evaluating the results of a solicitation for board candidates, the first such search SPP has conducted in seven years. The committee will discuss the issue further during its Aug. 27 meeting.
VALLEY FORGE, Pa., — PJM will continue the generator testing begun last winter with only minor changes after members rejected proposals to expand the program.
More than 62% of more than 130 stakeholders who responded to a poll said they preferred continuing the program — begun last winter in response to the high number of generator outages during the 2014 polar vortex — with only minor changes, PJM’s David Schweizer told the Operating Committee last week.
The proposal included only minor changes requiring generators to submit a primary and alternate date for the exercise; submit results of the exercise to PJM; and report completion of the cold weather preparation checklist through eDART. Manual 14D: Generator Operational Requirements also will be revised to clarify combined-cycle offers for generators exercising one combustion turbine on alternate fuel.
Members rejected three other options that would have made larger changes to the program, including option 2, which would not compensate Capacity Performance resources for participating after the winter 2015/2016. It received only 42% support.
Option 3, which received 34% support, would have expanded the exercise period -– currently the month of December -– to Nov. 1 through Jan. 15; increased the maximum temperature to 40 F from 35 F in the southern zones; and increased the maximum test allowed daily from 1,000 MW to 1,200 MW. It also would have included a reevaluation of the program after winter 2015/16 to determine whether it should be continued.
Option 4, a combination of options 2 and 3, also received 34% support.
The testing, which cost about $7 million last year, was credited with improving generator performance during the winter of 2014/15. (See Why Did PJM Grid Fare Better This Winter?)
PJM Seeks to Eliminate Disconnect on Metering Requirements
PJM plans to modify Manual 1: Control Center and Data Exchange Requirements to “close the gap” between PJM requirements and generator practices regarding metering.
PJM’s Ryan Nice presented the OC with a first read on a problem statement to create a task force to draft new manual language. “Some of these gaps are pretty extensive,” Nice said.
Nice said the revised manual will clearly delineate requirements for monitoring and control metering used by PJM’s state estimator and revenue metering used in settlements.
“This is the raw data” for settlements and operations, Nice said. “So it really behooves everyone to pay attention to this.”
Members should send the names of those interested in joining the task force to ryan.nice@pjm.com.
PJM Moves to Tighten Training, Certification Requirements
The System Operations Subcommittee will consider ways to increase compliance with PJM training and certification requirements under an issue charge approved by the OC.
The SOS will only suggest changes to section 3.3 of Manual 40: Certification and Training Requirements, which deals with compliance, and not to the actual requirements, as detailed in section 3.2, said Glen Boyle, manager of system operator training. The subcommittee’s work will also not deal with North American Electric Reliability Corp. requirements, Boyle said.
PJM has been tracking non-compliance among several generation dispatchers, demand response providers and energy storage device operators for months and the situation has not improved. The subcommittee will “look for options to get these companies back into compliance,” Boyle said. (See “Generators’ Non-Compliance Continues” in PJM Operating Committee Briefs, June 15, 2015.)
PJM also briefed members on other changes to Manual 40. The changes, intended to clarify PJM’s processes, will be brought to a vote at the next OC meeting.
Closed-Loop Interface Set for Dominion Chesapeake
PJM last week declared a closed-loop interface near Norfolk, Va., in the Dominion zone to address voltage or thermal problems that could result from an N-1-1 contingency during transmission upgrades expected to be completed by the end of the year.
The DOM-CHES closed-loop interface near Norfolk, Va. (in blue), was created to address voltage or thermal problems that could result from an N-1-1 contingency during transmission upgrades expected to be completed by the end of the year.
The interface, effective Aug. 14, will allow the RTO to set sub-zonal real-time prices for load management or generation during high load conditions or emergency transmission outages in the Dominion Chesapeake area, protecting the load pocket. The interface would be modeled for the day-ahead market but not for financial transmission rights.
Bath County SPS Extended for Cloverdale-Lexington Outage
PJM will extend the Bath County special protection scheme (SPS) during an outage required for upgrades to the Cloverdale-Lexington 500-kV tie line between the Dominion and American Electric Power zones.
The line is expected to be out of service from January through June 2016 during a reconductoring project and again from mid-September 2016 through mid-October 2016 for replacement of the Cloverdale transformers. The SPS will address the loss of one of six generators in Bath County and potential congestion on a 138-kV line as a result of the outage.
The SPS was initiated in September 2014 for the Dooms-Lexington 500-kV project, which is expected to be complete by the end of 2015.
PJM and Dominion will consider extending the SPS beyond 2016 to address other pending upgrades in the western Virginia area, PJM’s Liem Hoang told the OC.
Behind-the-Meter Initiative Yields 1,000 MW
PJM has identified about 1,000 MW of behind-the-meter generation as a result of an initiative following the September 2013 heat wave that caused two days of load shedding.
PJM was forced to cut power to 44,000 customers in southern Michigan, northern Ohio and northwest Pennsylvania as temperatures unexpectedly hit the mid-90s and the RTO found itself without enough generation during the fall maintenance period.
A third day of load sheds was avoided after the city of Sturgis, Mich., provided 8 MW of relief through conservation and its behind-the-meter generator. PJM had not been aware of the generator before the emergency. (See Heat Wave To-Do List Grows Longer.)
“If we had seen that [generation] early, we have indications that [Sturgis] would have been happy to come on to avoid having to shed load,” PJM Vice President of Operations Mike Bryson told the OC.
As a result of the incident, PJM began seeking information on other behind-the-meter generation in February. The project identified the nearest Bulk Electric System substations, so that operators can conduct distribution factor studies to determine how effective they would be in addressing constraints.
PJM’s Joe Mulhern said any relief from the generators would come on a voluntary basis because the RTO’s current rules provide no way to compel or compensate them. Such generators are eligible for energy market and ancillary service revenues, however.
Bryson said PJM will have to discuss the issue with each of its 14 states individually because of varying jurisdictional rules.
“We would be open to any of these kinds of discussions with them,” Bryson said.
PJM to Tighten Long-Term Transmission Outage Rules
PJM plans to revise its rules regarding long-term transmission outages in order to protect FTR revenues.
The current rules in Manual 3: Transmission Operations require transmission owners to submit any outages longer than 30 days by Feb. 1 so that they can be accounted for in the annual FTR auction.
But Simon Tam told the OC that some TOs have submitted two or more consecutive outages of less than 30 days at the same location and were not covered by the requirement. “Sometimes they’re not able to project every single piece of work they need to do … and need to extend the outage,” he said in a second briefing to the Market Implementation Committee.
Under the new rules, which will be added to the manual during a scheduled revision this fall, PJM will evaluate outages exceeding 30 days on the same line or transformer within an eight-month time span. If the outage causes a shortfall in FTR revenue, PJM will require the TO to reschedule it or pay for the congestion it causes, Tam said. The plan will be phased in over a year for TOs unable to meet the Feb. 1, 2016, implementation.
PPL’s Frank “Chip” Richardson expressed concern with the change at the MIC briefing, saying it could delay upgrades needed for the reliability of the system. He added that TOs have no way to recover congestion costs they might be assessed.
“We’re not going down the road of wanting TOs to pay for congestion,” Tam responded. “The intent is for the TO to do a little more advanced planning.”
If the upgrade in question is critical and should not be delayed, PJM can declare an emergency and the TO can complete the upgrade without a congestion charge, Tam said.
The New York Public Service Commission on Thursday approved a temporary 5.2% rate surcharge on delivery charges for Rochester-area electric customers, while a final agreement to keep the R.E. Ginna nuclear plant operating is hammered out.
The commission approved the surcharge, effective Sept. 1, to prevent “rate shock” while the final price tag for a reliability support services agreement is negotiated between Rochester Gas & Electric and Constellation Energy Nuclear Group, the plant’s owner (14-E-0270).
Industrial customers, environmentalists and consumer advocates had opposed the surcharge, arguing that the need for an increase was hypothetical until the RSSA is finalized.
The PSC, which had ordered the agreement to keep the plant operating until transmission alternatives are built, rejected requests to wait until the final costs were determined.
“If the commission does nothing, the costs associated with the RSSA, if later approved, could build to … being more than a 20% increase,” said Doris Stout, director of accounting at the PSC.
PSC staff estimated the rate increase would be about 10.4% if collection was delayed until January. RG&E estimates that its deferred collection will reach approximately $39.3 million from the effective date of the RSSA through the end of this month and will continue to grow, with interest.
RG&E has a balance of about $155 million in rate credits, which opponents of the rate surcharge want to use. Stout said using too many of these credits would adversely affect RG&E’s credit. PSC staff recommended, and the commission approved, that customer credits would be used to make up the difference between the amount collected from the surcharge and the cost of the RSSA.
The 5.2% rate was chosen in part because it matches estimates of the first-year revenue requirement for the Ginna Retirement Transmission Alternative, a project that would eliminate transmission constraints preventing the delivery of more generation into the Rochester area. PSC staff estimate the project will cost almost $140 million, with an in-service date of May 2017.
“I think what the staff has proposed here today is an elegant solution to a difficult problem,” Commission Chair Audrey Zibelman said at the meeting, citing the need to avoid rate compression while preserving the RG&E’s financial stability.
“I thought it made a huge amount of sense to say let’s set the level of the surcharge at the expected level of the transmission replacement because that’s a cost we know will be a long-term cost for the company to incur,” she added later.
Stout noted that requests for temporary rate increases are rare, saying the last she recalls was in 1996 for Niagara Mohawk.
“Although the scope and nature of RG&E’s ultimate liability to Ginna is uncertain, given that the RSSA may not be approved in its current form or at all, the reasonable costs of the reliability service obligation that was imposed upon Ginna in November ultimately must be recovered in some fashion,” the commission wrote. “An important element of just and reasonable rates is price stability and the avoidance of rate shock to consumers from sudden, significant increases.”
The agreement, set to be retroactive to April 1 once approved, would cost about $175 million a year and be effective through late 2018. Constellation said it wants to retire Ginna, which it says it lost more than $150 million between 2011 and 2013.
Ginna Negotiators File Extension
Negotiators for Exelon and RG&E have asked for a second extension as they try to hammer out an agreement to keep the plant operating.
“We will be seeking another short-term extension to allow for continued negotiations. Exelon remains committed to working with RG&E and a number of stakeholders to reach an agreement that will allow Ginna to continue providing safe, reliable energy to the region,” Exelon spokeswoman Maria Hudson said.
Under the terms of the RSSA, Exelon could have ended negotiations and closed the plant this month. The companies had asked on July 31 for an extension that expired Monday.
Meanwhile, a New York power plant owner asked FERC on Wednesday to rehear its complaint that the Ginna agreement is suppressing capacity market prices (ER15-1047).
The company said Federal Power Act Section 205 gives FERC jurisdiction over the “price-suppressive” effects of the RSSA and that the commission misunderstood the company’s reasoning.
“The commission should grant rehearing because its failure to consider whether the RSSA is just and reasonable in light of the effect it will have on the rates the NYISO pays to suppliers in NYISO’s capacity market is in violation of the commission’s statutory duty, in contradiction of prior commission orders and judicial precedent, and is arbitrary, capricious and not based on substantial evidence,” the petition states.
ISO-NE and the New England Power Pool Participants Committee want to begin using the RTO’s system-wide sloped demand curve in their Annual Reconfiguration Auctions.
The organizations submitted proposed Tariff changes to FERC that would apply the curve — first used in the ninth Forward Capacity Auction earlier this year — to the ARAs beginning in June 2016 (ER15-2404).
Under the current rules, demand in ARAs is represented by the fixed value of the installed capacity requirement.
The proposed changes “simply incorporate the system-wide demand curve used in an initial Forward Capacity Auction into the Annual Reconfiguration Auctions so that demand will be represented consistently in both FCAs and ARAs,” the petition said.
“Such consistency in the demand model from auction to auction avoids predictable, structural price differences,” Matthew C. Brewster, lead analyst in ISO-NE’s market development department, wrote in accompanying testimony.
Demand in import- and export-constrained capacity zones will continue to be established by local sourcing requirements and maximum capacity limits, respectively, the RTO said.
The RTO will conduct three ARAs to allow for the exchange of capacity supply obligations prior to the 2018/19 capacity commitment period covered by FCA 9.
The changes would not affect how suppliers participate in reconfiguration auctions. But unlike current rules, in which clearing occurs only through matching of counterparty offers and bids, clearing would occur using the demand curve, even without a counterparty.
The changes received the unanimous support of the NEPOOL Participants Committee and near-unanimous support from the NEPOOL Markets Committee.
Power generators have opposed a system-wide sloped demand curve and advocate a zonal demand curve to reflect capacity constraints in parts of New England. (See ISO-NE, NEPOOL Oppose Demand Curve Change.)
VALLEY FORGE, Pa. — PJM planners have selected 11 small market efficiency projects and narrowed the list of proposals for its biggest congestion problem to 12 candidates.
The 11 projects — all transmission owner upgrades — have a combined cost of $59.2 million, with a benefit-cost ratio of 15.6 and estimated 2019 congestion reductions totaling $50 million. The PJM Board of Managers is expected to consider planners’ recommendations of the projects at their meeting in October.
“These are all locational type projects … they’re cheap fixes basically,” PJM’s Tim Horger told the Transmission Expansion Advisory Committee on Thursday. Over 15 years, “you’re going to see hundreds of millions” in savings.
The 12 proposed fixes for the AP South/AEP-DOM constraints will undergo further analysis, including an initial cost review and sensitivity analyses for changes in load forecasts, fuel prices and interface ratings.
About 20 of the larger proposals passed the 1.25 benefit-cost threshold. The 12 finalists are those that continued to meet the 1.25 threshold using a base case incorporating the 11 small projects and also reduce congestion for combined 2019 and 2022 simulations with minimum production costs and load payment savings of $20 million.
They range in cost from $15.7 million to $300.7 million.
Vice President of Planning Steve Herling said it was possible — though unlikely — that the AP South/AEP-DOM fixes could displace one or more of the 11 smaller local projects. “We’ll pull one of [the smaller projects] out of there if we have to,” he said.
Sharon Segner of LS Power questioned PJM’s method of winnowing the list, saying the RTO’s Tariff requires such projects be based only on the zone seeing reduced load payments.
(Click to zoom.)
“When you have multiple projects that all pass, the Tariff doesn’t tell us how to decide [among them],” Herling responded. “We’re having to use our judgment.”
Segner said PJM had told stakeholders that selections would be made based on the highest cost-benefit ratios. “That’s what motivates the market,” she said. “Otherwise it becomes pretty subjective and loosey-goosey.”
In total, PJM received 93 market efficiency proposals, including 35 transmission owner upgrades ranging from $100,000 to $68 million and 58 greenfield projects with costs of $9.2 million to $432.5 million.
Second Proposal Window Opens
PJM opened a second transmission proposal window Aug. 5, seeking solutions to 2020 transmission owner criteria violations and reliability problems identified from planners’ light load analysis. The RTO will accept proposals through Sept. 4.
No Projects Arise from ARR Review
The annual review of auction revenue rights feasibility resulted in no transmission upgrade projects, planners said. Already-approved upgrades were identified for violations on most of the 45 paths analyzed over the 10-year horizon. Three paths in the ATSI zone that saw violations in years nine and 10 will be monitored for potential upgrades in the future.
PJM: Despite Lack of Cost Allocation Rules, MISO Project Too Good to Ignore
PJM doesn’t know how it would allocate costs from its share of a potential transmission upgrade MISO is considering in southern Indiana, but the project’s potential to fix longstanding stability problems at American Electric Power’s Rockport substation is too compelling to ignore, planners said.
“The challenge is this is a market efficiency project in MISO and a reliability project in PJM” — a combination for which there are no cost allocation rules in the PJM-MISO joint operating agreement, Herling said. “This is just such a good opportunity we don’t want to let it go by.”
The area has added thousands of megawatts of generation but no new transmission since 1989. As a result, the Rockport substation has operated under a special protection scheme involving relays, and tripping and ramping down of generators. About 4,400 MW of generation was tripped in a 2007 incident.
PJM will have to move quickly; MISO planners intend to recommend the winning project to the MISO Board of Directors in December.
Initial results of PJM’s analysis are expected in time for MISO’s Aug. 19 Planning Advisory Committee meeting.
“It could be a win-win,” said PJM’s Chuck Liebold.
Planners Reevaluating Pratts Project
PJM is reconsidering its selection of the Gordonsville-Pratts-Remington transmission upgrade after learning that it will require 15 to 18 miles of new right of way, far more than initially believed.
In February, planners recommended the proposal from Dominion Resources and FirstEnergy at an estimated cost of $129 million to $164 million.
“We want to double check to make sure we’re doing the right project,” said General Manager of System Planning Paul McGlynn, who said planners will evaluate a Gordonsville-Remington route among the alternatives.
The Virginia State Corporation Commission, which would have to approve the project, says that existing rights of way should be given priority as the locations for transmission additions.
A representative for Madison County, Va., urged PJM to reject the original plan. He said the scale of the project is out of proportion to the rural county — population 13,000 — which is dependent solely on farming and tourism and has no public water or sewers. “That’s the question — the need versus what’s being proposed,” he said.
McGlynn noted, however, that the project is not being driven solely by load in the Pratts area.
PJM solicited solutions in its second Order 1000 proposal window last year.
Four developers suggested 16 proposals, including two transmission owner upgrades and 14 greenfield projects. Only six of the proposals were judged to have solved the violations. Two losing bidders, ITC Holdings and LS Power’s Northeast Transmission Development, have challenged the choice in letters to the PJM board. (See Tx Developers Challenge PJM Choice on Pratts Project.)
Planners will reevaluate the options in September and make a recommendation to the board in October.
Known to his friends as “Jay,” the 49-year-old Citrolo lived in Southampton, N.J., with his wife Sandi and his dogs, Jada and Mya.
