WASHINGTON — FERC Commissioner Tony Clark announced Thursday he will not seek reappointment when his term expires in June.
“After discussing with my family over the holidays we have decided to not seek another term on the commission,” he said at the opening of the commission’s monthly meeting. “It has been a wonderful run here and I’ve enjoyed the 12 years prior to this on the North Dakota [Public Service] Commission and a number of years prior to that in state government. I’ve enjoyed it a lot, but there comes a time when you just feel like it’s time to do a little something else.”
Commissioner Tony Clark (Source: FERC)
Clark, 44, was elected to the North Dakota legislature at age 23. “So I’ve been in government a long time,” he said.
With the departure of Commissioner Philip Moeller in October, Clark became the lone Republican on the commission. He said he may serve beyond the end of his term if a replacement has not yet been confirmed.
Clark said he wanted to announce his plans now to give notice to his staff and those who may be interested in replacing him. “So I thought I would announce today rather than play coy for the next six months or so.”
Chairman Norman Bay said he was sorry to lose Clark, promising to celebrate and “roast” him at a future meeting. “You’ve been just an amazing colleague,” he said.
On Thursday, he commented on the repeated interruptions of the commission meetings by protesters opposed to the commission’s approval of natural gas pipelines. “I find it rather ironic, he said, “that just 24 hours before a very major winter storm on the East Coast, we have people protesting the very infrastructure that will keep them alive over the next 72 hours.”
PJM’s proposed rule changes designed to address underfunding of financial transmission rights will be the subject of a FERC technical conference on Feb. 4.
The Financial Marketers Coalition (representing J. Aron & Co., DC Energy, Inertia Power, Saracen Energy East and Vitol), Shell Energy and others challenged the changes, in particular the elimination of netting negatively valued FTRs against positively valued FTRs within portfolios (EL16-6-001, ER16-121).
The conference will consider PJM’s auction revenue rights (ARR) modeling and allocation processes; treatment of portfolio positions in allocating underfunding or surplus among FTR holders; the potential for market manipulation; and balancing congestion in ARR/FTR product design. (See FERC Orders Tech Conference on PJM FTR Rule Changes.)
PJM made changes to improve FTR revenue adequacy between 2010 and 2015, but then said the changes resulted in an unfair shift of revenues from ARR holders to FTR holders.
In addition to the netting change, PJM in October proposed to increase ARR results by 1.5% per year in the Stage 1A 10-year simultaneous feasibility process. (See PJM to File FTR, ARR Rule Changes with FERC.)
The conference will be held from 9:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. in the commission meeting room.
OKLAHOMA CITY — SPP’s Strategic Planning Committee last week agreed to allow its Clean Power Plan Task Force to go dormant after endorsing its comments to EPA.
The committee agreed with Chair Mike Wise’s recommendation during its Jan. 14 meeting that the task force, which developed one white paper comparing the mass- and rate-based compliance approaches and a second capturing SPP and stakeholders’ comments on the proposed federal implementation plan, be allowed to suspend its work.
“These two white papers reflect what you wanted the task force to do,” Wise, who also chaired the task force, told the committee. “I think this task force should stay dormant until the SPC decides we work on Clean Power Plan initiatives that come out of the EPA’s final implementation of the federal plan, or until it’s needed for future work.”
The task force was formed to review the CPP, recommend SPP’s role in assisting states’ compliance and inform staff and member dialogue with environmental regulators. In addition to developing the two white papers, it drafted a set of talking points for members’ use with their state regulatory and environmental agencies.
The SPC endorsed both white papers and their filing with EPA, but not before accepting a “friendly” amendment at SPP Director Phyllis Bernard’s request to strike the use of “reserve” when referring to a reliability allowance to avoid confusion with reserve margins. The group also amended the language to make it clear SPP won’t make resource decisions for its members.
“These white papers teed up all the issues and concerns associated with them, and all the things we would advocate as an organization,” said Michael Desselle, vice president and chief compliance and administrative officer.
Oklahoma Gas & Electric abstained from both endorsements and the friendly amendment, saying it was not prepared to vote. Kansas City Power & Light and Dogwood Energy also abstained from endorsing the comments to EPA.
“I think it’s fine SPP wants to review this,” OG&E’s Jake Langthorn said, “but it should be clear this review doesn’t affect in any way how OG&E believes it should respond and how the state [of Oklahoma] should respond.”
The task force compared the mass- and rate-based compliance approaches by analyzing how allowances and credits are supplied; monitoring, verification and tracking; allocation issues; leakage under mass-based plans; and reliability implications.
Its comments to EPA on the federal plan call for a reliability safety valve in both the federal and state plans; an incremental reliability allowance for FIPs; considering regional precedent in FIPs; allowing resource owners to retain allowances for retired resources under the mass-based plan; and a consolidated review process for both plans.
“We identified reliability concerns with a lack of conformity, or consistency, across the region,” said SPP Vice President of Engineering Lanny Nickell. “We think it’s preferable that as many states as possible come up with a common approach.”
Asked whether there was a need to have the task force look at specific impacts to SPP’s market, Nickell said not until there is a request to do a reliability assessment. “We won’t do that until we see all the state plans as they are developed,” he said.
“Strategically, I think it’s important for every state in the region to be the same, because that’s the least cost for the region,” Wise said.
More Detail Requested on Technology Committee
The SPC resisted SPP’s suggestion to form an advanced technology steering committee that would provide input into staff research and development, share best practices for technology deployments and perform studies. The committee told staff to return with additional detail on its proposal.
“The scope needs to be fully developed, better than it is now,” said Lincoln Electric’s Dennis Florom.
SPP staff pitched its technology steering committee as providing a forum to help SPP make policy decisions when deciding how to incorporate technologies such as smart grid, demand response, energy storage, distributed energy resources and grid-optimization techniques (dynamic line ratings and topology control).
Jay Caspary, SPP’s director of research, development and special studies, said the committee would be helpful in determining broader applications of these new technologies and provide a way to gain input from members on how to prioritize organization research and budgets.
Stakeholders were divided over the need for SPP to get involved in R&D — “Specific technological issues are already assigned to specific technical groups,” Florom pointed out — and whether the task force should report to the SPC or the Markets and Operations Policy Committee.
“Whether it reports to MOPC or the SPC, I don’t care,” Caspary said. “I need a forum where I can get input and direction … to drive technological transfer and deployment within the SPP footprint for the benefit of SPP members.”
Caspary said SPP funds research within the industry but does not do any of its own in-house.
Several members expressed a desire to manage their own R&D budgets. Xcel Energy’s Bill Grant said, “I don’t want to see SPP running around spending money on efforts where the companies are not interested in them.”
The Wind Coalition’s Steve Gaw, while not a member of the committee, said, “This is a broader issue than that. This has to do with new, changing dynamics that everybody is dealing with and how the grid has to be more flexible and deal with new technologies.”
“Technology is moving at such a rapid pace, this group should be talking about what do with big data and what do with big technology,” KCP&L’s Denise Buffington said. “I would encourage this group to be educated about it and work it into the strategic plan.”
“I sense from the discussion, the committee would like you to go back and look at this some more … take this information back and mull it over,” Wise told Caspary.
Several members volunteered to work with Caspary on improving the proposed committee’s scope and responsibilities.
Postage Stamp Rate a ‘Valid Conversation’
The SPC took a hard look at the potential unintended consequences of the Transmission Planning Improvement Task Force’s work, given previous MOPC discussions about the Z2 Payment Plan Task Force. (See related story, Latest Z2 Credit Project Delay Renews Old Frustrations).
“We’re locking down some of the fundamental things the group wants to do,” said Antoine Lucas, SPP’s director of transmission planning and the TPITF’s staff secretary. “We’re looking at resources, the actual scope of work that’s been requested and the schedule … where we can shave those [work effort] peaks.”
Lucas and the task force’s chair, NextEra Energy Transmission’s Brian Gedrich, have been guiding the work on the planning process’s methodologies and modeling and the appropriateness of the planning cycle and assessments. They plan to host an educational forum and present their final recommendations to the SPC, MOPC and Board of Directors in April.
Langthorn suggested “the next step in the conversation should be … how to leverage the market in order to meet obligations to serve that load.”
“We already have a system that makes it difficult to make improvements. One person pays for [the improvement], and everyone benefits from it,” Langthorn said. “It’s also time to rethink how we pay for transmission … that’s not regionalized. Who pays for that? Maybe it’s time we start looking at a postage stamp rate … to take full advantage of the market.”
SPP Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer Carl Monroe responded, saying “That is a valid conversation we need to have.”
Wise said the issue would be part of the discussion during the committee’s May retreat.
The House of Representatives last week voted to block new EPA regulations protecting streams and requiring restoration of mountains damaged by coal mining. The vote, 235-188, means the measure now goes to the Senate. President Obama has vowed to veto the bill.
The administration said the new rules are needed to protect streams from coal-mining damage. But Republicans said the rules would mean the end of tens of thousands of coal industry jobs at a time when the industry is already under pressure from low natural gas prices and increased emissions rules.
“West Virginia is blessed to be abundant in natural resources,” said Republican Rep. Alex Mooney of West Virginia. “Unfortunately, the president is intent on destroying coal as a domestic energy source.”
Obama to Push for Changes in Federal Land Energy Use
Jewell
The Obama administration on Friday announced a moratorium on new coal leases on federally managed land after the president pledged in his final State of the Union speech to change the way federal lands are used for fossil fuel development to “accelerate the transition away from dirty energy.”
The moratorium was announced by Interior Secretary Sally Jewell, who said it was time to re-examine the coal-leasing program. “It is abundantly clear that times are different in the energy sector now than they were 30 years ago,” she said.
The move won plaudits from clean energy advocates. “It’s time to not only reform our fossil fuel leasing program; we need to keep fossil fuels in the ground,” said Erich Pica of Friends of the Earth.
President Obama, in his final State of the Union address, bragged on the progress the country has made in building out solar and wind facilities in the effort to cut emissions.
“Listen,” he said, “seven years ago, we made the single biggest investment in clean energy in our history. Here are the results. In fields from Iowa to Texas, wind power is now cheaper than dirtier, conventional power. On rooftops from Arizona to New York, solar is saving Americans tens of millions of dollars a year on their energy bills and employs more Americans than coal — in jobs that pay better than average.”
“We’re taking steps to give homeowners the freedom to generate and store their own energy — something, by the way, that environmentalists and Tea Partiers have teamed up to support. And meanwhile, we’ve cut our imports of foreign oil by nearly 60% and cut carbon pollution more than any other country on Earth.
House Committee Approves Bill for Nuclear Energy Research
Smith
A House committee has approved a bill that will direct research and development money toward nuclear energy. The bill, approved by the Science, Space and Technology Committee, directs the Department of Energy to set nuclear energy research as a priority.
While calling for the use of resources of national labs, such as use of supercomputers, to help in the research, the bill also calls for the design and construction of an experimental reactor within the next 10 years.
“Strategic investments in advanced nuclear reactor technology should play a much more meaningful role in reducing global emissions,” said Committee Chairman Lamar Smith (R-Texas) during a hearing last week.
More than 150 environmental groups have signed a letter calling on the Government Accountability Office to investigate FERC, calling it “a rogue agency that is blatantly biased towards pipeline companies it purports to regulate.”
The letter, sent to Democratic Sens. Bernie Sanders (Vermont) and Elizabeth Warren (Massachusetts), who are members of the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, says the commission “is misusing legal loopholes and ignoring court orders to advance gas infrastructure projects while preventing the public from exercising their rights to judicial review or fair public participation in the process.”
The letter was signed by groups such as Delaware Riverkeeper, the Sierra Club and Environment NJ, which have lined up to oppose an increase in pipeline development to deliver energy derived from new Appalachian shale production.
Pipeline Finds New Opponent in Northeast Energy Solutions
Tennessee Gas Pipeline’s Northeast Energy Direct project attracted yet another opposition group when public advocacy group Northeast Energy Solutions filed a formal protest with FERC about the project.
The group listed more than 50 problems with NED’s application for the $5 billion, 400-mile pipeline that is planned to bring natural gas to constrained markets in New England. The group said the application is incomplete and contains errors, especially in the mandated listing of names of owners of property the pipeline would traverse, as well as an incomplete environmental assessment.
“The industry has never witnessed a proposal for an energy project seeking government approval that is as patently defective as the one submitted by Tennessee Gas Pipeline,” said Vincent DeVito, the group’s attorney.
OKLAHOMA CITY — The Markets and Operations Policy Committee approved Tariff revisions that will set guidelines for distributing revenues from last year’s settlement with MISO over its use of SPP’s transmission grid. Three members opposed the Regional Tariff Working Group’s proposal and eight others abstained.
The RTWG drafted language to handle revenues accrued during three phases (Jan. 29, 2014 to Jan. 31, 2016, Feb. 1, 2016 to Jan. 31, 2017, and each Feb. 1 to Jan. 31 period thereafter) and define how they will be collected and distributed.
It also revised other Tariff sections to take the new revenue distribution into account. SPP has said it favored allocating the funds to transmission owners, with benefits flowing through to the grid’s load.
Bill Grant of Xcel Energy opposed the request, saying the issue was not sufficiently vetted through the stakeholder process.
MOPC Endorses Recommendation to Pull Reliability NTCs; Other Projects, STEP Get OK
The MOPC unanimously endorsed staff’s recommendation to withdraw notifications to construct (NTC) for two reliability projects estimated to cost $40 million, including the South Shreveport-Wallace Lake 138-kV rebuild in northwestern Louisiana.
Antoine Lucas, SPP’s director of transmission planning, said the project was originally identified as a reliability need by SPP’s 2015 Integrated Transmission Plan 10-year assessment, but the 2016 ITP Near-Term assessment indicated the project is no longer necessary. It had an $18.6 million cost estimate.
SPP had also proposed the 11-mile project as an interregional project with MISO to meet economic needs, but MISO declined to support it. (See SPP, MISO Conclude Joint Study Empty-Handed.)
The 2016 ITPNT also showed there was no longer need for the Mineola-Grand Saline 69-kV rebuild in East Texas, estimated to cost almost $23 million.
“This project was primarily load driven,” said Midwest Energy’s Bill Dowling. “We really don’t think this is driven by dispatch of resources, but by load.”
Planners said further evaluation is necessary for two other projects, the $36 million Hobart-Roosevelt Tap-Snyder 69-kV rebuild in West Texas and the $7.1 million Linwood-South Shreveport 138-kV rebuild, because additional solutions for these needs were identified in the 2016 ITPNT.
American Electric Power was responsible for all four projects.
The committee also endorsed staff’s recommendation to move forward on two other projects. Members agreed (with six abstentions) no further re-evaluation was needed to construct a new 345/115-kV transformer and links to 345- and 115-kV lines at the Stevens County substation in southwestern Kansas, and agreed (with two abstentions) to remove conditions from an NTC that would provide fast-acting reactive power to a pair of 115-kV substations in southeastern New Mexico.
The Stevens County substation work is a joint project between Southwestern Public Service and Sunflower Electric Power, and has a projected $31.9 million cost, up from an original estimate of $18.3 million. Questioned on the costs, Lucas said the estimates “could be reduced once design work starts.”
The 111-kV China Draw-Road Runner projects belong to SPS. Despite an $84.8 million price tag, Lucas said the 2016 ITPNT indicates a need remains and it has been identified as the best solution.
“Once we re-evaluate a project and it’s still the right project, we recommend removing conditions,” Lucas said.
The MOPC also unanimously endorsed staff’s recommendation that the Board of Directors next week approve SPP’s 2016 Transmission Expansion Plan report (STEP), a comprehensive listing of all the RTO’s transmission projects over a 20-year planning horizon.
The 2016 STEP consists of 480 upgrades with a total cost of $6.1 billion. The projects include transmission-upgrade and generation-interconnection requests, approved high-priority upgrades and approved projects from the ITP 20-year, 10-year and near-term assessments.
Lucas said SPP members completed 93 transmission upgrades worth $856 million in 2015. He said the RTO also issued 50 NTCs for another $519.9 million worth of projects.
Staff will finalize its 2016 ITPNT this April and the 2017 ITP10 in January 2017.
A Tariff revision to allocate the cost of manual commitments for voltage-related local reliability issues failed to receive approval from the MOPC. The measure, which would assess costs based on the asset owner’s impacted load, received only 41.3% approval from members, with 29 no votes and 17 abstentions.
“We’ve deviated from the philosophy of network load,” Xcel’s Grant said. “This whole discussion started with non-jurisdictional entities not solving the problem, but we went way further than we needed to go. It would be a disproportionate shift for New Mexico.”
Some members questioned whether SPP staff should have drafted the revision request and determined cost allocation in the first place.
“We as staff said one of our major principles is to take uplift and give it to the people who are causing it,” said SPP Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer Carl Monroe. “This is just another way to do that … and it’s going through the process. Don’t vote on this if you think it’s a short-term solution. It’s going to take a long time to get some of those things fixed.”
The committee endorsed two other revision requests from the Market Working Group, in addition to 12 others approved as part of the consent agenda:
RR 124, which adds language from the Tariff to the market protocols supporting SPP’s ability to reject incomplete market registration applications, was approved unanimously.
RR 127, approved with two no votes and four abstentions, eliminates the opportunity for jointly owned units (JOUs) to game make-whole payments by putting in a larger-than-normal energy offer curve and getting dispatched to minimum. For JOUs using the combined resource option, the rule takes all shares’ pricing points and aggregates them into one energy offer curve.
The MWG also shared its responses to nine recommendations by SPP’s Market Monitoring Unit to improve the Integrated Marketplace. Working with input from the MOPC leadership, the MWG developed an action plan on the Monitor’s recommendations in November for presentation to the Board of Directors next week.
The Monitor’s annual State of the Market report in July identified issues ranging from improving quick-start logic to market-power mitigation conduct thresholds. Several of the proposals have been implemented or are in process. (See SPP Monitor Report Shows ‘Maturing’ Integrated Marketplace.)
“We’re not saying [these recommendations solve] all of our problems, but [they do] a good effort moving everything forward we proposed,” said SPP’s MMU director, Alan McQueen.
‘Real Work’ to Begin on 2017 ITP10
Having completed a resource plan and a resource-siting plan, the working group developing the 2017 ITP10 will now begin building the economic model, assess constraints and do some benchmarking.
“Now the real work begins,” MOPC Chair Noman Williams said.
ITC Holdings’ Alan Myers, chair of the Economic Studies Working Group, said Clean Power Plan compliance will be a key part of the model. The group has developed three futures, two of which incorporate regional and state-level compliance and a third that assumes the CPP is not implemented.
“The ITP10 is the first salvo” in dealing with the CPP, Myers said. “I think we’re going to see more detailed studies.”
Reacting to concerns from Oklahoma Gas & Electric’s Greg McAuley that the resource plan didn’t include current load, Myers agreed the plan was a little out of date, having been developed and approved last year.
“The problem is if we do this over and over again, you never get to the finish line,” he said.
Myers shared the working group’s renewable and conventional resource siting plans as part of his informational update. He said the ESWG identified state mandates and goals, totaled what renewables were in place and then looked for gaps.
“It’s not actual shortfalls, but timing,” he said, noting some companies entered into new renewable contracts following the analysis.
Task Force Agrees on 18-month Planning Cycle, Common Model
The Transmission Planning Improvement Task Force said it has reached consensus on an 18-month planning cycle, a common planning model, a planning process and a standardized scope.
NextEra Energy Transmission’s Brian Gedrich, the task force chairman, told the MOPC the stakeholder process approvals and model development are bottlenecks and can limit the planning process’s frequency.
“The way the ITP20 is today, it doesn’t add value,” Gedrich said, pointing to “resource-intensive” work that provides “primarily strategic value, and not actionable results.”
Gedrich said the group has agreed on a strawman proposal that identifies the models that need to be built and removes near-term recommendations.
“The concern was the two-year economic assessment we’re moving to is much closer to what’s happening in real time,” he said.
The task force has scheduled a Feb. 3-4 meeting in Dallas, when staff is to unveil the final strawman, and an educational forum before the next MOPC meeting. The committee will then be asked to endorse the proposals to the board.
Task Force Continues Work on Improving Transparency
A task force working on improving transparency of members’ tariff-revision requests and proposing changes to SPP’s current prioritization processes updated the MOPC on its current progress.
The group is designing a structure in which members can submit revision requests and “enhancement” requests online through SPP’s Request Management System (RMS). (See “Prioritizing Revision Requests” in SPP Markets and Operations Committee Briefs.)
Staff prioritizes the requests in groups (in flight, primary, secondary, tertiary and other) before publishing them in a portfolio. Stakeholders can comment on the requests through the RMS and during quarterly stakeholder prioritization meetings one month before MOPC meetings.
Stakeholders can still request MOPC guidance and discussion on items of interest.
“When SPP staff puts in the time to explain issues, people may not realize that’s just starting the discussion. There’s no pre-determined outcome,” said SPP director Phyllis Bernard. “The board has been very encouraging in that [staff] get a strawman out, so we can have substantial conversations.”
“When we get on a call with stakeholders, they’re expressing their opinions and staff expresses their opinions,” Carl Monroe said. “MOPC becomes the appeals group for that.”
The task force received 68 comments during the comment period, and 38 stakeholders from 24 member organizations participated in the first quarterly prioritization meeting. That led to five action items for SPP staff.
The 2016 cycle begins Jan. 30, the deadline for submitting new enhancement requests. The next quarterly prioritization meeting will be held March 25.
Order 1000 Interregional Filing
SPP staff updated the MOPC on its failed attempt to create a new class of seams transmission projects, an effort to supplement its approved highway-byway cost allocation that was rejected by FERC on Nov. 30. (See FERC Rejects SPP Proposal for Seams Transmission Projects.)
“We had hoped by developing principles, we would avoid gaps,” said SPP’s Sam Loudenslager. “We realized there are still gaps in the process after the FERC order.”
“If FERC thinks … seams projects are already covered under Order 1000 compliance, do we have a problem?” Richard Ross of AEP asked.
“I think we do,” Loudenslager said. “Seams projects will not fit under the interregional process, where we do things on a project-by-project basis.”
“These projects come out of the joint operating agreement,” Monroe said. “It’s hard to take a project out of these other processes and use the Tariff to pay that through cost allocation.”
“We need a seams partner willing to look at these highway-byway projects,” said the Nebraska Public Power District’s Paul Malone. “MISO and [the Southeastern Regional Transmission Planning] don’t recognize these.”
Generation Group Recommends No Changes for Renewable Ratings
The Generation Working Group presented its bi-annual report on generating unit ratings, recommending no changes in the methodology for establishing wind and solar facilities’ net capability. Its report on summer 2015 looked at wind generation’s historical performance and commitment data from the Integrated Marketplace and compared generation-outage data to the previous summer season.
Noting the report’s information is compiled annually, AEP’s Ross wondered whether gathering the data every other year would suffice.
“There’s a lot of data that goes into this report,” said Mitch Williams of Western Farmers Electric Cooperative. “Doing this every year keeps it current.”
Violations Within SPP RE Drop into Double Digits
The SPP Regional Entity’s quarterly report revealed violations within the RE dropped below triple digits for the first time since 2009.
“The violations are less severe than they were a few years ago. Seventy-five percent of the issues … are someone being late turning something in or someone forgetting to sign a document,” the RE’s general manager, Ron Ciesiel, told members. “You’re helping by identifying issues before they fester and turning into real problems.”
The RE reported only 21 events in 2015, with just one reaching category 2 status and nine reaching category 1 status on a 5-point scale.
Ciesiel said critical cyber asset identification was the most frequent violation.
CARMEL, Ind. — The Stakeholder Governance Working Group sifted through the MISO governance guide paragraph by paragraph, refining priorities and committee hierarchies in the second of a two-day work session last Tuesday, part of the RTO’s stakeholder redesign.
The group doled out a draft of a redesigned pecking order for committees and their priorities. It also created assignment templates for groups that want to raise issues at meetings. MISO stakeholders will be required to complete an issue assignment template going forward for “ongoing issues with significant and substantial changes.”
Tia Elliott, director of regulatory affairs at NRG Energy, said the template will require members to clearly define their issue and explain what needs to be addressed instead of simply raising a hand at a meeting.
MISO Stakeholder Relations Specialist Alison Lane expressed concern that anyone could identify an issue, meaning that stakeholders could spend time on issues of lower importance. “That’s the one thing that makes me really balk on this,” Lane said.
Under the proposed revisions, MISO would be required to announce meetings and post agendas and supporting documents “well in advance.”
Stakeholders said MISO also should limit the number of priorities it identifies in its annual strategic planning process.
“The ideal number of priorities is somewhere in the range of three to five to be effective. Too many priorities dilute the process and results in no real priorities being identified,” the SGWG wrote. The group added that stakeholder priorities should “reflect key elements of the MISO strategic priorities.”
The SGWG is also asking how MISO’s Advisory Committee can become involved in MISO’s annual discussion on priority setting. Stakeholders mulled over how often parent entities should review the status of their issue prioritization among themselves and the working groups and task teams they’re charged with, settling for now on a semi-annual schedule.
“This isn’t our last crack at it. We’ll do some more wordsmithing and get a clean version,” said Bill SeDoris, director of MISO integration for Northern Indiana Public Service Co.
The guide, now about 45 pages, includes new wording to provide for the review and “parking” of issues that haven’t been addressed by their due dates. New draft language also states that “major decisions” made by subordinate entities aren’t considered final until an Advisory Committee review.
At one point, Lane discouraged the group from including too many parliamentary procedure instructions in the guide, insisting that stakeholders should know how to conduct meetings.
“I just hate for us to put language in on Robert’s Rules of Order instead of good information on policy,” Lane said.
Greg Schaefer, energy market policy manager at MidAmerican Energy, said much was accomplished in the two-day policy review.
The revised governance guide will not be released publicly until it is presented at the Jan. 27 Steering Committee meeting. SeDoris said he also hopes to put the draft language before a vote at the Feb. 9 SGWG meeting, with final approval at February’s Advisory Committee meeting.
“I think status quo was clearly not working,” said WPPI Energy’s Valy Goepfrich of the old stakeholder process. She said it is up to stakeholders and MISO to ensure the changes streamline policymaking. “This is all going to happen again unless we follow this process.”
Elliott said the governance guide is often turned to in other MISO meetings to settle matters. “There’s a lot of value here,” she said.
OKLAHOMA CITY — SPP could handle wind-penetration levels of up to 60% with additional transmission and monitoring tools, officials told the Markets and Operations Policy Committee last week.
The RTO’s first wind integration study since 2009 found that wind energy, which represented about 14% of system capacity at the end of 2015, will expand significantly based on requests in the interconnection queue. The study analyzed SPP’s transmission area for system reliability breakpoints due to increased wind generation and said additional operational procedures should be considered “to reliably operate above the currently installed maximum wind capability.”
If its recommendations are implemented, the report said, SPP’s transmission system could “reliably handle” wind representing up to 60% of internal SPP load. The RTO saw record wind-penetration levels last year approaching 39% and a record wind peak of 9,948 MW. (See SPP, ERCOT Set New Wind Peaks.)
SPP studied wind-penetration levels of 30%, 45% and 60%. A voltage-stability analysis indicated renewable penetration levels are approaching current limits. SPP also analyzed wind energy ramping, re-dispatch and outages and steady-state thermal and voltage.
“We’re at those levels where [previous] studies said we would start having issues,” said Casey Cathey, SPP’s manager of operations engineering analysis and support. “We could have situations where we hit 45% without reliability concerns, but is that for an hour or sustained?”
Cathey said SPP has 156 wind farms totaling 12,380 MW of installed capacity and will reach 16,960 MW of installed wind at the end of 2016. SPP projects at least 2,035 MW will be added in 2017.
The report calls for expediting transmission projects, noting that about half of the 4,580 MW of wind expected to be added this year will require new lines. It also shows the need for “some limitation before we can build out the system further,” Cathey said.
It also recommended installing voltage reactive support capabilities for existing wind farms; enhanced operations tools, to monitor real-time voltage stability limits; allowing the reliability coordinator additional flexibility in re-dispatching; new planning criteria for and evaluation of phasor measurement units to provide real-time situational awareness.
“It’s worthy to note SPP put a significant amount of wind growth in the system,” The Wind Coalition’s Steve Gaw said. “It’s working … we have high penetration with low loads, and we’ve been able to do that reliably.”
Cathey said SPP is “good at forecasting wind,” but that ramping issues take place in two- to three-hour timeframes, not five-minute intervals.
“We know it’s going to ramp,” he said, “but we don’t know when. We know it will happen in the morning, but we don’t know if it’s 6:30 or 7:30.”
Cathey said SPP is continuing to improve its weather forecasting, which is supplied by energy & meteo systems. MISO also uses energy & meteo.
SPP has scheduled a wind-integration summit Feb. 17-18 at its headquarters in Little Rock, Ark. Cathey said the summit will provide stakeholders an open forum to ask questions, provide feedback and critique the study’s results.
New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman asked FERC on Friday to prevent a natural gas pipeline developer from clearing trees along the route of one of its projects while water quality permits are pending (CP13-499).
Constitution Pipeline wants to build a 124-mile pipeline through New York to connect shale gas fields in Pennsylvania with markets further east.
“Since cutting down trees in the pipeline corridor constitutes construction, the [Office of Energy Projects] may not grant the request to proceed unless and until Constitution has obtained all of the authorizations required under federal law to construct the proposed pipeline,” Schneiderman wrote in his request for a stay.
The pipeline has all the necessary permits except for water quality certification under Section 401 of the U.S. Clean Water Act. That application is pending before the state Department of Environmental Conservation. The project would cross 220 bodies of water along its route, according to the attorney general.
Schneiderman said tree cutting would cause “irreversible alterations” to property before required permits are obtained.
Constitution told FERC in January 2015 that tree cutting must be conducted between Nov. 1 and March 31 to comply with U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service recommendations to mitigate impacts on migratory birds and the northern long-eared bat.
“Constitution is therefore requesting written authorization … to commence limited, non-mechanized tree felling activities necessary to comply with these conservation measures,” the company wrote to FERC.
The developer said it would use chainsaws to cut trees at or above ground level and would not disturb soils or root systems. It said it would leave the felled trees in place until other construction started.
FERC granted Constitution a certificate of public convenience and necessity in December 2014. The project has encountered fierce opposition from the group Stop the Pipeline, which cites environmental threats to streams, wetlands and forests along its route. (See Constitution Pipeline Opponents Asks Appeals Court to Force FERC Action.)
Entergy wants state regulators to appoint an administrative law judge to counteract “political pressures” and referee disputes with New York officials in an investigation of the Indian Point nuclear power plant’s operations (15-02730).
The plant owner on Tuesday asked the New York Public Service Commission to appoint the judge to handle disputes over confidential documents and other matters related to an investigation of the plant ordered last month by Gov. Andrew Cuomo after two unplanned outages.
Indian Point Nuclear Power Plant (Source: Wikipedia)
Cuomo has called for closure of the plant for several years because of its proximity to New York City. He said the plant’s two units have had 13 unplanned shutdowns since June 2012, including two incidents nine days apart last month.
“We must ensure that the 20 million people that live within the shadow of Indian Point are truly safe from a nuclear incident … [so] I would specifically request that you examine the capital and maintenance budgets at the plants and their potential impact on these outages, and the impact these sudden outages can have on the continued safe operation of the plants,” Cuomo wrote in a letter to PSC Chairman Audrey Zibelman on Dec. 16.
Cuomo ordered the PSC to report the findings of its investigation by Feb. 15.
In two rounds of interrogatories in recent weeks, Entergy said, PSC staff sought information on finances and operations that go beyond a state’s jurisdiction and are the purview of federal regulators.
“Given the political and timing pressures being imposed on [Department of Public Service] staff, there is a particular need for an impartial ALJ to resolve Entergy’s objections,” the company wrote.
“The investigation is equally unprecedented in that it seeks highly detailed financial and operational information regarding Indian Point spanning across five- to 10-year time periods, even though Indian Point must earn its revenues from the wholesale markets pursuant to tariffs within the exclusive regulatory authority of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.”
Entergy said it will cooperate “in good faith” with many aspects of the investigation but finds the scope “objectionable.”
In December the Nuclear Regulatory Commission told Entergy it can continue to operate Indian Point’s Unit 3 under its existing 40-year license, which expired last month, while its license renewal review continues. Unit 2’s license expired in 2013, but it is also operating under an extension while the company’s application is under review.
The two outages that prompted Cuomo’s action occurred on Dec. 5 and 14.
In the first incident, a faulty electrical breaker controlling a roof fan caused a trip at Unit 2, according to NRC. The commission said operators manually shut down the reactor when the faulty breaker caused a drop in voltage to the mechanisms controlling about 10 of the reactor’s control rods.
On Dec. 14, Entergy said the shutdown was caused by a “disturbance” on the non-nuclear side of the plant that connects to the grid.
FERC on Wednesday approved the sale of two upstate New York power plants, the same day Gov. Andrew Cuomo vowed the generators would “transition” away from coal or be closed by 2020.
The commission approved the sale by Upstate New York Power Producers of the 312-MW Cayuga plant outside Ithaca and the 668-MW Somerset facility in Niagara County to Blackstone Group unit Riesling Power “as consistent with the public interest” (EC15-214).
With the Dec. 31 mothballing of NRG Energy’s Dunkirk plant and the 380-MW Huntley Power Station in Tonawanda expected to close at the end of March, Cayuga and Somerset will be the last two coal-fired plants in New York.
Cayuga Plant (Source: Wikipedia)
Their continued operation runs headlong into Cuomo’s clean energy agenda, which calls for the state to obtain 50% of its energy from renewable resources by 2030.
Cuomo repeated that pledge in his annual State of the State address Wednesday. “We will eliminate all use of coal in New York state by 2020. We will help the few remaining coal plants transition, but we must clean our air and protect our health and that must be our first priority,” Cuomo said.
According to the governor’s office, coal accounts for 4% of electricity generation in New York, a number sure to drop even more absent Dunkirk and Huntley.
A group of bondholders formed Upstate New York Power Producers to purchase Cayuga and Somerset from the bankrupt AES Energy East for $240 million in 2012. No price was disclosed when the sale to Riesling was announced in September. (See Blackstone Seeks Two Coal-fired Plants in New York.)
Cayuga is operating under a controversial reliability support services agreement that runs until June 30, 2017. It also has a proposal before the New York Public Service Commission to repower to natural gas with ratepayer assistance paid over the next 10 years. (See Cayuga Power Plant Repowering Opposed.)
The Sierra Club, which opposes the above-market payments, asked FERC to compel Riesling to provide information regarding the Cayuga plant’s future.
FERC ruled those questions outside the scope of the proceeding and said the sale “will not have an adverse effect on rates.”
No plans about the future of the Somerset plant have been made public. “There are a number of announced initiatives on the future of energy markets in the state of New York. The details on how they will be achieved while maintaining a reliable electric system in the state at a fair economic price will highlight the importance of these assets to the system,” Riesling spokesman Michael Enright said Monday. “We look forward to reviewing the details of the governor’s plan and will, upon approval of the sale by the PSC, seek to promptly engage in constructive dialogue with major stakeholders to create a path forward.”
That path, according to a briefing book released in conjunction with Cuomo’s budget, includes a directive to state regulators to work with NYISO to “develop a regulatory framework that will ensure system reliability while facilitating repowering to cleaner fuel or closure.”
In reaction to the budget and in anticipation of pending action before the New York Public Service Commission promoting clean energy development, an organization representing power generators again emphasized a market-based approach.
Gavin Donohue, CEO of the Independent Power Producers of New York, said “generators that are able to meet their emissions requirements and perform economically should be allowed to operate in the state.
“State strategies that pick winners and losers are especially redundant in light of record low fuel and wholesale market prices that are currently driving uneconomic facilities to retire,” he continued. “Just this past December, New York saw the lowest wholesale price of energy since the market was created, and those prices are being reflected in consumers’ energy bills and generators’ decisions to invest in new resources.”
More than 150 environmental groups have signed a letter calling on the Government Accountability Office to investigate FERC, calling it “a rogue agency that is blatantly biased towards pipeline companies it purports to regulate.”
Tennessee Gas Pipeline’s Northeast Energy Direct project attracted yet another opposition group when public advocacy group Northeast Energy Solutions filed a formal protest with FERC about the project.
