Search
March 7, 2025

Retiring CPUC President Still Has Lots to Say

By Hudson Sangree

CHEYENNE, Wyo. — Former Gov. Jerry Brown sent his energy aide Michael Picker from Sacramento to San Francisco five years ago, telling Picker he wanted him to serve on the California Public Utilities Commission to try to set things right at the beleaguered agency.

“‘I need you to go down there,’” Picker recalled Brown saying. “He voluntold me.”

In 2014, the commission was in disarray. Its then-president, Michael Peevey, was under fire for his allegedly cozy relationships with the investor-owned utilities it regulated. Accounting irregularities were being investigated. And the San Bruno gas pipeline explosion of 2010 had raised concerns about its ability to ensure public safety.

Picker
CPUC President Michael Picker and FERC Commissioner Cheryl LaFleur attended the annual meeting of the Western Conference of Public Service Commissioners in Wyoming last week. | Michael Picker

Picker, 67, became president in early 2015 after Peevey’s departure and led the commission through utility-sparked catastrophic wildfires, the huge gas leak at Aliso Canyon and other crises. He recently announced he would retire once Gov. Gavin Newsom appoints his successor, which he has yet to do.

Outspoken as usual, Picker talked about his accomplishments and the commission’s challenges during an interview Wednesday at the Little America Hotel and Resort, where he attended the annual meeting of the Western Conference of Public Service Commissioners.

“It’s a process of rebuilding an organization that’s stumbling over its own history,” Picker said of the commission while sitting outside on a sunny spring morning on the high plains.

The commission was established more than 100 years ago to make unhurried and often unpopular decisions, Picker said. It began in 1911 as the California Railroad Commission and was meant to stem the abuses of powerful railroads, especially the Southern Pacific Railroad, whose reach extended into the State Legislature, the governor’s mansion and even the state Supreme Court.

“Prior to the founding of the CPUC, the Southern Pacific Railroad dominated California politics,” according to a history of the CPUC posted on the commission’s website. The railroad “provided free train passes to politicians and their family members, donated generously to political campaigns and dominated state party conventions to ensure delegates were friendly to the company’s interests.”

“Gov. Leland Stanford, a Southern Pacific co-founder, went so far as to appoint Edwin Crocker to the California Supreme Court, where Crocker served while retaining his position as general counsel for Southern Pacific,” it says. “Public backlash to Southern Pacific gave rise to the Progressive movement, which succeeded in electing Gov. Hiram Johnson and eventually establishing the CPUC to rein in railroad power and influence.”

The commission was renamed and given oversight of electric and gas utilities, telecommunications and water companies. It’s had the somewhat thankless job of approving new utility infrastructure and getting ratepayers to cover costs.

Picker said the commission is still a product of its era and not set up to respond to fast-changing technologies and public-safety crises such as wildfires. But he said he’s done his best to change that within the limits prescribed by statute and the state constitution.

In particular, he said he’s instituted organizational and cultural changes among PUC staff and its five commissioners — and he’s put far more emphasis on public safety.

“When I got there, no one was talking about safety, even though San Bruno was just a few years before,” Picker said.

Shortly after taking office, Picker — whose expertise was in environmental issues and organizational reform, not utilities — decided to stand outside the PUC headquarters on Van Ness Avenue and hand out fliers to the commission’s hundreds of employees. The fliers invited workers to contact him on his cell phone with safety concerns they felt had been ignored.

“It was a way for me to have conversations with staff,” Picker said.

Some who read the message contacted Picker, saying it was the first time they’d spoken with a commissioner, he said. They said their safety concerns would travel up the staff chain of command but never be dealt with by commissioners, who were aloof and unresponsive.

“That taught me a lot about what needed be to be done at the PUC,” he said.

Creating Consensus

The situation was right up Picker’s alley. He’d spent years addressing vexing problems in unorthodox ways and bringing together people from different arenas. His work had included serving in Brown’s first administration in the early 1980s setting up toxic waste programs and as a state deputy treasurer in the late 1990s.

“I try to focus on developing solutions that don’t lead to the next round of failures,” Picker said.

As chief of staff to Sacramento Mayor Joe Serna Jr. in the 1990s, he set up neighborhood divisions within city government to give residents more say and to encourage officials to tackle local issues.

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger tapped him to help get renewable energy projects approved by FERC and other federal authorities. He set up a multiagency team consisting of representatives from the federal Bureau of Land Management, the U.S. Department of Agriculture and different state agencies to map out the process for 150 projects, each generating more than 100 MW. It was his first real work in the energy sector, he said.

Schwarzenegger, and later Brown, asked him to deal with the CPUC, which as a rate-setter is the “second largest taxing agency in the state,” he said. Some lawmakers distrusted the commission and, over time, created a system of checks and balances to slow down its decision-making and force it to operate transparently. For instance, it is only allowed to decide cases on the written record before it.

A slow, lengthy process is good if there’s a danger that utilities are trying to game the market, he said. But it’s not so good at responding to fast-moving changes that people care about, such as wildfires and cell phone service.

“The way we make decisions is very hard for people to understand and participate in,” Picker said.

Picker
Picker has defended the CPUC’s practices before the State Legislature as utility-sparked wildfires ravaged the state.

When he became CPUC president, Picker said he decided not to act like his predecessors. Instead of using his prerogative to name an executive director, he made it a group project “designed to create consensus … [so] commissioners felt like they were part of the organization,” he said.

In August 2015, the commission began an investigation into Pacific Gas and Electric’s safety culture in response to the San Bruno gas explosion, which killed eight residents of a suburban San Francisco neighborhood. That was before the massive Butte Fire of 2015, the disastrous wine country fires of 2017 and last year’s Camp Fire, which leveled the town of Paradise and killed 85 people. PG&E equipment started nearly all the fires, state investigators concluded.

Picker said he and his fellow commissioners reinvigorated the CPUC’s Safety and Enforcement Division, which had languished under prior presidents. Deputy Executive Director Elizaveta Malashenko was selected to head the division.

“I’m proudest we brought back the safety division,” Picker said of his achievements.

A bill signed by Brown in 2018, SB 901, gave the CPUC oversight of IOUs’ wildfire mitigation plans. The commission recently approved the first plans under the bill, along with provisions governing power shutdowns for fire prevention. (PG&E took advantage of those provisions on Saturday and Sunday, when windy conditions caused fires near Sacramento and threatened foothill areas. PG&E told nearly 30,000 customers they could lose power.)

‘A Matter of Time’

Picker said it will be up to future commissions to continue improving wildfire safety.

Utilities need to use drones and other technology to increase line inspections, he said. The CPUC cannot inspect all the state’s power lines, as some have suggested, he said. It would take at least 1,300 new employees and $125 million a year to make that happen, Malashenko recently told a legislative committee. (See California Utilities Prepare as Fire Season Looms.)

“It flies in the face of what we were designed to do,” Picker said. The CPUC performs limited inspections of railroad lines, mainly at-grade crossings, while the railroads use specially equipped engines to inspect their tracks, he said.

The legislature could make changes to how the commission operates, or the state constitution could be amended, he said, “but it’s clearly not the right time to do all of that,” with wildfires and other issues taking precedence.

Picker said one notable change during his tenure has been the perception of California by other Western states. CAISO’s efforts to start a Western RTO have been largely rebuffed both inside and outside the state, he said. But the Western Energy Imbalance Market has been embraced as a no-strings-attached way to trade energy across state lines. Animosity toward California has decreased, he said, and one day the West may be organized into a formal wholesale market.

“Everyone knows where this is going,” he said. “It’s just a matter of time.”

As for retirement, Picker said he felt that after 10 years dealing with energy, and a new governor wanting to name a new president, it was time. “It seemed like a natural break,” he said. Newsom did not ask him to leave, he said.

Picker said he’ll keep pursuing new challenges and may return to his roots as a river guide. He’s been invited on a monthlong trip down the Blue Nile in Ethiopia and Sudan, but he hasn’t made up his mind to go.

FERC Delays Mich. Tx Decision for State Input

By Amanda Durish Cook

FERC last week temporarily suspended ruling on Consumers Energy’s complaint over a pending transmission project in southern Michigan until state regulators weigh in on the project’s classification.

The commission’s move on Friday freezes the April complaint against Michigan Electric Transmission Co. (METC) over the Morenci Interconnection Project until the Public Service Commission decides whether the line qualifies as transmission or distribution (EL19-59).

Mich.
Michigan Public Service Commission | Google Maps

Consumers has claimed that the $21 million, 138-kV line near the Michigan-Ohio border has more in common with a distribution project than a transmission project and should be classified as such. The Morenci project was included in MISO’s 2018 Transmission Expansion Plan over objections by the utility, which argued the line should be recognized as distribution under FERC Order 888’s seven-factor test because it would be radial in nature.

The PSC interceded in the dispute last month to claim jurisdiction over the issue, prompting METC to file a motion for FERC to hold the complaint in abeyance until the state commission renders its own determination. (See Michigan Regulators Intercede in MTEP Complaint.)

“We find that a determination of the classification of the Morenci Interconnection Project is central to addressing Consumers’ concerns raised in the complaint,” FERC said.

FERC said granting the motion won’t “unreasonably delay” its decision in the complaint, as Consumers had argued. The federal commission pointed out that the PSC has promised to act “as expeditiously as possible” on the matter. The state commission already held a prehearing conference on June 4 (U-20497).

“While we agree with Consumers that [FERC] is not required to allow a state regulator to weigh in on every asset classification dispute, this proceeding will benefit from the Michigan commission’s expertise and familiarity with its seven-factor test framework as applied to the Michigan Joint Pricing Zone,” FERC said.

The federal commission also directed METC to file the PSC’s decision in the federal docket within 15 days of its release.

MISO Adding Week-ahead Forecasts

By Amanda Durish Cook

CARMEL, Ind. — MISO said it will combine several data sets to create a new and comprehensive multiday operating margin forecast.

The forecast would provide anywhere from a 72-hour to a week-ahead supply-and-demand forecast, stakeholders learned at a Market Subcommittee meeting Thursday.

MISO
Chuck Hansen speaks at the June 6 MSC meeting. | © RTO Insider

MISO market analyst Chuck Hansen said as the RTO relies more on load-modifying resources and intermittent resources, a multiday, “volumetric” forecast becomes more helpful to identify operating issues days in advance.

The RTO is not proposing to tie financial commitments to the forecast, which would instead be considered purely informational, intended to aid market participants in supply decisions. However, the new effort has parallels to MISO’s 2017 talks on the possibility of a multiday energy market, a project currently “in hibernation,” according to Hansen. (See MISO Scales Back Multiday Market Proposal.)

But the proposed idea is still in its conceptual stage, and MISO hasn’t settled on which data will inform the forecast.

MISO so far envisions a three- to seven-day forecast with either system-level or regional data aggregation that would be updated daily. The RTO envisions it will pull together load forecasts, intermittent resource forecasts and known available capacity, allowing for outages, lead times for offline resources, operating reserve requirements and interchange schedules.

“There’s a desire in MISO to create best-in-class operating margin forecasts,” Hansen said.

He said MISO could also predict flows on the regional settlement path, estimate behind-the-meter contributions and anticipate stranded capacity. The idea is to work in several data streams to create the most sophisticated forecast.

Customized Energy Solutions’ David Sapper asked if MISO already compiles all the data it envisions using to inform the forecast.

Hansen replied that it currently calculates some, but not all, of the information.

“It’s not a formalized process. There’s no report that kicks out this kind of information,” Hansen said.

MISO currently publishes a look-ahead by region report, which forecasts seven days of hourly load and outage data and separate 48-hour hourly wind forecasts.

But its existing reports don’t contain a quantification of operating uncertainty, Hansen said.

“This information is increasingly becoming more important to market participants,” he said.

Hansen said MISO is informally reaching out to stakeholders for suggestions and that he will return to future Market Subcommittee meetings to refine forecast components.

Calif. Wildfire Panel Urges End to Strict Liability

By Hudson Sangree

SACRAMENTO, Calif. — A panel created by last year’s Senate Bill 901 unanimously approved its own recommendations to the governor and legislature Friday that include overturning the state’s strict liability standard for utility-sparked wildfires and establishing a fund of up to $40 billion to compensate fire victims.

The Commission on Catastrophic Wildfire Cost and Recovery was tasked with finding ways to deal with the costs and liabilities of massive wildfires, fueled by drought and climate change in recent years. Commissioners decided a top priority was getting rid of the state’s practice of inverse condemnation, which holds utilities liable for fires started by electrical equipment regardless of negligence. The costs are often passed on to ratepayers.

wildfires
A panel created by last year’s SB 901 said utilities should face a negligence standard for fires sparked by their equipment. | © RTO Insider

“The current method of allocating costs for these fires — socialization through utilities and ratepayers — has destabilized the state’s energy sector, with the largest utilities facing increasing costs of capital and an imminent threat of bankruptcy,” the commission wrote in its report.

Pacific Gas and Electric filed for bankruptcy in January, citing $30 billion in liability for massive wildfires in 2017 and 2018, including the Camp Fire, the state’s deadliest, in November 2018. Southern California Edison and Sempra Energy, the parent company of San Diego Gas & Electric, watched their credit ratings crumble and stock prices sink in the wake of the Camp Fire and PG&E bankruptcy.

wildfires
Pedro Nava | © RTO Insider

The commission’s five members consist of Chairwoman Carla Peterman, a former member of the California Public Utilities Commission; Dave Jones, a former state lawmaker and insurance commissioner; Michael Kahn, former CAISO chair and prominent lawyer; Pedro Nava, also a former lawmaker and head of the state’s Little Hoover Commission; and Michael Wara, a Stanford University researcher and expert on climate and energy policy.

They were given about six months to come up with proposed solutions to vexing problems. The commission held five public hearings between February and June. The last was Friday at Sacramento City Hall.

During that hearing, some members expressed strong support for doing away with inverse condemnation, saying the huge costs are undermining the reliability of the electric system.

wildfires
Michael Kahn | © RTO Insider

“Having inverse in a no-fault situation results in billions of dollars in costs, and that is stressing the system in a way that we find inequitable and problematic,” Kahn said. He urged moving to a negligence standard, requiring a showing of fault before a utility could be held liable for wildfires.

Others have urged similar measures. A separate “strike force” created by Gov. Gavin Newsom recommended altering inverse condemnation in April, and Newsom indicated then that he supported the idea. (See Calif. Must Limit Wildfire Liability, Governor Says.)

At a press conference, he pointed to a chart showing a massive increase in wildfire damages in the past two years — with nearly $20 billion in 2017 and almost $25 billion in 2018.

wildfires
Michael Wara | © RTO Insider

“Who the heck’s going to pay for that? Everybody wants someone else to pay. … The person behind the curtain is going to pay for that,” the governor said. “I’m of the opinion … [that] we all have a burden and responsibility to assume the costs.”

Newsom and legislative leaders, however, put out a joint statement last month, when the wildfire commission issued its draft report, that took a more cautious approach to changing inverse condemnation.

“We are committed to continuing the exploration of the impact of strict liability on the costs to ratepayers, on wildfire victims and on the solvency of our utilities,” it said. “If the trend of massive, catastrophic wildfires persists, we may need to pursue additional changes.”

‘Into the Blender’

Doing away with inverse condemnation may be difficult, if not impossible, however. The principle is enshrined in the state constitution, under the premise that utilities are given the governmental power of eminent domain to establish easements for power lines and must pay for any damage to private property.

wildfires
Carla Peterman | © RTO Insider

The political climate also doesn’t favor utilities. Many voters remain angry with PG&E and other investor-owned utilities for burning down large swaths of the state — and, in PG&E’s case, causing the deaths of more than 100 people — in the fires of 2017 and 2018.

At Friday’s hearing, fire victims and their lawyers strongly protested any move to upend inverse condemnation, saying people who lost their homes in utility-caused fires four years ago are awaiting compensation, with some still living in camping trailers. Taking away the victims’ quickest avenue for compensation will only result in further hardship, they said.

wildfires
Dave Jones | © RTO Insider

“People who aren’t getting paid are at the mercy of the utilities, which they will be if you take away inverse condemnation,” said Sacramento lawyer Steven Campora, a longtime foe of PG&E. Campora represented victims in the 2010 San Bruno gas line explosion that killed eight and resulted in PG&E’s conviction on six felony charges in 2016.

The judge overseeing PG&E’s probation in that case ordered the utility’s new CEO and board members to tour the devastation in the town of Paradise, scene of the Camp Fire, which they did on Friday as the wildfire commission was holding its final hearing. (See PG&E Probed by Plaintiffs’ Lawyers, SEC.) The Camp Fire killed 85 people and largely leveled the town of 27,000 residents in the Sierra Nevada foothills.

Other recommendations approved by the wildfire commission included:

  • Revising and clarifying the “prudent manager” standard that allows IOUs to recover wildfire costs from ratepayers if the CPUC determines a utility prudently managed its system. “The commission received testimony that the current standard for determining prudency is unclear and protracted,” it said in its draft executive summary. Commissioners generally supported the plan.
  • Establishing an Electric Utility Wildfire Board to consolidate “governance of all utility catastrophic wildfire prevention and mitigation into a single entity separate from the California Public Utilities Commission,” which now handles many of those tasks, though some critics say it’s ill-equipped to do so. Commissioners voiced mixed reactions to the proposal.
  • Creating a “large and broadly sourced Wildfire Victims Fund, to more quickly and equitably socialize wildfire costs, and maintain the health of state’s utilities.” The proposal, which some commissioners said would require up to $40 billion, was controversial because it remains unclear how it would be funded — whether by ratepayers, utilities, their shareholders or a combination of contributors.

Nava said the commission’s proposals are unlikely to be adopted wholesale, if at all. “These recommendations are going across the street [to the State Capitol and] into the blender, right?” he said. Lawmakers will probably pick and choose the pieces they favor while rejecting others, he said. “There will be a certain amount of cherry-picking.”

SPP Market Performed Well in Winter, MMU says

The SPP Market Monitoring Unit has released its quarterly State of the Market report for the winter, which includes a discussion of several weather events.

SPP
Electricity and gas prices | SPP

The MMU said the market performed well during the winter months, “sending appropriate price signals during times when delivering power reliably was more challenging.” It said higher prices during an event indicates “a greater need for energy at a particular location.”

The report covers December 2018 through February 2019.

The MMU will host a webinar on Wednesday to add further color to the report.

SPP
Generation by technology type | SPP

Highlights for the period include:

  • Day-ahead energy prices climbed slightly, while real-time energy prices fell from winter 2018 levels.
  • Average hourly load in December and January was in line with the prior years, with only February exceeding previous levels.
  • Wind generation capacity continued to climb, increasing to 21.4 GW, a 5.3-GW increase from a year ago.
  • Generation by coal resources continued to decline, dropping to 44% of the fuel mix.
  • Overall profits from virtual transactions at the resource level nearly doubled from the previous winter, while profits at interfaces shot up from $200,000 to $3 million, which the MMU attributed to day-ahead and real-time price differences stemming from a modeling issue.
  • Net market-to-market payments from MISO were about $6.3 million, compared with nearly $16 million the year before.

— Tom Kleckner

MISO Proposes Protections for FTR Market

By Amanda Durish Cook

CARMEL, Ind. — MISO last week proposed a set of changes to buttress its financial transmission rights market and said it will convene a new task team to work out the details of the fledging proposal.

Two alterations involve stiffer collateral requirements, while the third will prohibit known “bad actors” from participating in the RTO’s FTR auctions. During a Market Subcommittee meeting Thursday, MISO and stakeholders created a task team to refine the three-prong proposal.

MISO
Brian Brown | © RTO Insider

“MISO has had no losses in the FTR market. Having said that, that doesn’t mean that there aren’t opportunities to improve,” said Brian Brown, a credit analyst with the RTO.

Brown said the improvements are targeted for April 2020, before the next annual FTR auction. By Friday, MISO will create the task team that will draw up the two required Tariff filings this fall, Manager of Credit and Risk Management Matthew Mullin added.

According to Brown, MISO is considering introducing a 5-cent/MWh minimum collateral requirement, which would boost collateral by $35 million across the entire FTR market.

Credit requirements could also be adjusted based on a proposed mark-to-auction valuation that would estimate the market value changes of an FTR portfolio by calculating the difference between FTR purchase prices and the most recent auction prices. PJM recently introduced such a measure to spot reductions in portfolio value in order to increase credit requirements, saying declining market value can be an indicator of increasing risk in FTR markets.

MISO said it plans to require FTR traders to post collateral based on the highest figure derived from either the current FTR credit calculation, the new minimum amount or the mark-to-auction valuation.

Customized Energy Solutions’ Ted Kuhn asked if the changes might negatively impact participation rates in the FTR market.

“We expect the impact to be minimal, but it’s difficult to forecast that,” Brown said, adding that MISO market participants have always been willing to post collateral.

RTO staff also said they will discuss the changes with its Independent Market Monitor.

MISO is justifying the changes based on a 2003 FERC policy statement that said the commission expects that ISO/RTOs “should act on behalf of their membership to minimize likelihood of default.”

Preventing ‘Bad Actors’

In a separate Tariff filing, MISO will seek to bar what it deems “bad actors” — either those that have defaulted or settled market manipulation charges in FERC jurisdictional markets — from becoming market participants.

Mullin said MISO currently lacks the authority to keep those with ill intent out of its markets.

“In light of recent events, we believe MISO should have authority to prevent bad actors from participating. … Right now, we don’t have the explicit authority to do anything,” Mullin said. “We believe this is a logical next step.”

He was referring to GreenHat Energy’s record default in PJM’s FTR market. MISO recently completed a scheduled analysis of its FTR market and has repeatedly reassured members that similar failures are unlikely to occur. (See MISO Offers Reassurances on FTRs, Examines Changes.)

Mullin said MISO must still define what constitutes a “bad actor” and what steps it will take after identifying one. He said the new task team would work out those details.

“These improvements won’t eliminate the risk of a loss; however, it closes the gaps and the opportunity to exploit those gaps. More importantly, it will reduce the magnitude of a loss,” Brown said.

Brown stressed that MISO’s historical FTR performance shows that it has been “minimally exposed.” He added that its FTR market has never experienced a default.

Residents Protest Biomass at Mass. DOER Hearing

By Michael Kuser

SPRINGFIELD, Mass. — More than 100 people turned out Wednesday evening at John J. Duggan Academy to protest a Department of Energy Resources proposal to alter the state’s renewable portfolio standard to include biomass plants.

DOER

About a hundred people outside a DOER hearing in Springfield on June 5 protest proposed RPS revisions. | © RTO Insider

“We want to give everybody an opportunity to be heard in an equal and fair way, and it’s really our opportunity to listen to your feedback on the proposed changes we have made to the regulations,” said Mike Judge, DOER renewable energy division director.

The state’s RPS requires all electricity retailers in the commonwealth to obtain minimum percentages of their supply from renewable resources, starting at 16% last year and increasing 2% annually to 80% in 2050.

The DOER in April filed draft changes to the RPS that would allow facilities burning non-forest derived woody biomass to receive grants for up to 80% of construction and installation costs and still receive ratepayer subsidies for energy generated, increasing the likelihood of biomass generators being built.

Nearly 300 people attended the fourth and final public hearing on the topic hosted by the department June 4. Among the nearly 60 people testifying were a dozen biomass industry proponents and five members of the Springfield City Council opposing plans by Palmer Renewable Energy for a 35-MW wood-burning plant in East Springfield.

DOER

Melvin Edwards | © RTO Insider

City Councilor Melvin Edwards, who testified that he is in line for a double lung transplant, told RTO Insider that, “The first day that this plant runs will be the first day and the only day that it would run its cleanest, regardless of the standards as they change. It will never be a benefit for my community except for the few jobs it will create, and allow me to suggest that the majority of the jobs … will be at the respiratory department of Baystate Medical Center.”

Edwards said that “we don’t want to make this about any one project.”

Different Voices

DOER
John Clarke | © RTO Insider

Licensed forester John Clarke testified in favor of the RPS changes.

“I practice sustainable forestry in my daily business and know that there’s opportunity for sustainably derived wood chips to provide local, renewable fuels for thermal, electric and co-generation facilities,” Clarke said. “These fuels are renewable and will directly replace fossil fuels, leaving ancient carbon in the ground and utilizing biogenic carbon for our energy needs.”

DOER

Springfield City Councilor Jesse Lederman addresses the DOER panel on June 5 in front of about 300 people. | © RTO Insider

City Councilor Jesse Lederman drew a standing ovation from about two-thirds of the crowd when he opposed the RPS changes as providing subsidies “to large-scale wood-burning incinerators in Massachusetts and the region.”

“I particularly draw your attention to the 2010 Manomet [Biomass Sustainability and Carbon Policy] study, which was commissioned by the state … and clearly found that these types of large-scale, low-efficiency incinerators were not carbon-neutral and could accurately be compared to the emissions of a coal power plant,” said Lederman, who is chair of the council’s committees on sustainability and the environment and health and human services.

Lederman said he and his colleagues would ask the legislature to remove biomass completely from the RPS statutes and also requested that the DOER extend the deadline for written comments to June 30. On Friday, the department pushed the deadline to July 26.

Charlie Bagnall of Peterson Pacific, a manufacturer of wood processing machinery, said he favored accommodating non-forest derived wood fuels such as the byproducts of vegetation management by utilities and from other sources. His company tries “to be as green as possible,” he said, telling how it implemented Tier 4 diesel emissions standards in 2012, six years before they went into effect in Massachusetts.

DOER

Tanisha Arena | © RTO Insider

Jake Dubreuil, sales manager of Barry Equipment in the town of Webster, testified that “1 million tons of non-forest derived fuel sources are produced annually — 1 million — in Massachusetts alone. … With the proposed changes to the RPS, responsible solutions … can be monitored by our state regulatory commissions and committees, ultimately displacing the use of fossil fuels.”

Tanisha Arena, executive director of local activist group Arise for Social Justice, testified that, “Biomass isn’t clean energy. Burning anything isn’t clean energy.

“If you betray Springfield with a biomass plant, Palmer Renewable Energy gets $10 million to $12 million a year in renewable energy subsidies, but we, the residents of Springfield, receive what? Will you compensate us for the nasty air we will breathe?”

NYISO Reports Grid Ready for Summer

NYISO said Wednesday it expects to have adequate resources on hand to meet slightly above-normal demand this summer, with 42,056 MW of capacity available to meet a forecasted peak of 32,382 MW.

The figures show the ISO will far exceed its capacity requirement of 35,002 MW, which includes an operating reserve requirement of 2,620 MW.

NYISO

New York statewide generating capacity by fuel type | NYISO

“The state’s grid is well-equipped to handle forecasted summer demand,” said Wes Yeomans, NYISO vice president of operations, said in a statement. “We have performed on-site visits of key generating stations to discuss maintenance, testing and adequacy of fuel supplies for hot-weather operations.”

The ISO’s projected summer peak is 1.5% above the 10-year average and outpaces last summer’s actual peak of 31,861 MW recorded on Aug. 29 (and the 2017 peak of 29,677 MW) but is down from the 2018 peak forecast 32,904 MW. Demand topped 31,000 MW on six days last summer.

The peak is calculated to reflect normal summer conditions, but under more extreme weather scenarios peak demand could increase to about 34,186 MW, NYISO estimates. The ISO’s record peak of 33,956 MW occurred in July 2013 at the end of a heat wave.

The total capacity of power resources available to New York this summer include 39,295 MW of generating capacity from in-state power plants, 1,309 MW of demand response resources and 1,452 MW of imports from neighboring regions. The forecast factors in the expected impact of distributed resources and energy efficiency programs.

NYISO staff and the New York Department of Public Service last month informed the state’s Public Service Commission on summer electricity preparedness. (See “Grid Prepared for Summer,” NYPSC Modifies Standby Rates for DERs.) The department forecasts summer energy prices will be down 1 to 3% compared with last year, depending on load zone and weather conditions.

– Michael Kuser

Panel: Action Needed in Response to Oscillation Event

By Rich Heidorn Jr.

ORLANDO, Fla. — Tim Fritch, vice chair of NERC’s Synchronized Measurements Subcommittee, said June 4 that his panel’s research into the Jan. 11 Eastern Interconnection oscillation event has identified the need to improve data sharing and provide guidance for responding to such events.

Oscillation
Tim Fritch, vice chair of NERC’s Synchronized Measurements Subcommittee | © ERO Insider

Fritch briefed NERC’s Planning Committee on a survey the subcommittee created to determine whether utilities were aware of the event and how they responded. NERC reported earlier that the event lasted about 18 minutes, with power swings of 200 MW around Florida and 50 MW around ISO-NE.

Eleven utilities responded to the survey, including both transmission operators and reliability coordinators, and nine said they were aware of the event. Only two utilities reported taking action in response, both taking some of their units out of automatic generation control when they were oscillating, Fritch said.

Seven of the utilities agreed there is a need to develop both a phasor measurement unit data-sharing requirement for RCs, and a real-time regional oscillation and source detection tool. The same number agreed the SMS should identify and address gaps in existing reliability standards on RC-to-RC coordination.

The event was illustrated in a video by the University of Tennessee’s FNET/GridEye tool.

Oscillation
Rob Cummings, NERC’s senior director of engineering and reliability initiatives | © ERO Insider

“It was hard to tell, unless you saw the very beginning of that video, who was creating the oscillation and who was responding,” said Fritch, an electrical engineer for the Tennessee Valley Authority. “And then going back and listening to RC calls, it was hard for the RC operators to understand where this all originated. So, I think we all agree this is something that needs to be addressed because a lot of these operators were essentially flying blind. Fortunately here, there were only two utilities that took action. … We know that, depending on what units were taken offline, it could have made the oscillation worse. … We need to address that and provide guidance to our operators about what to do when we have these type of events — or what not to do.”

Rob Cummings, NERC’s senior director of engineering and reliability initiatives, said that using FNET/Grid Eye “within 15 minutes I knew that it was a forced oscillation … and I also pinpointed the beginning and end to be in Tampa, Fla. So, if I could do that … the operators could too. And I’m more than willing to put together tutorials on how to determine this for the RCs.”

Fritch said the SMS would “essentially hand [the issue] off” to the Operating Reliability Subcommittee for additional discussion.

Standing-room Only for NERC EMP Meeting

By Rich Heidorn Jr.

ORLANDO, Fla. — NERC’s task force on electromagnetic pulses (EMPs) will hold its first face-to-face meeting at the ERO’s offices in D.C. on June 12, but if you’re not already signed up, it’s too late to attend in person.

Director of Engineering and Standards Howard Gugel told a joint meeting of the Operating, Planning and Critical Infrastructure committees here on June 4 that the meeting was already full but that the daylong session will be accessible via WebEx.

EMP
Howard Gugel, NERC director of engineering and standards | © ERO Insider

Gugel said NERC is planning a workshop on the subject for late July that will be held in a larger venue.

The task force was formed in response to the Electric Power Research Institute’s April report on EMPs, which concluded that a high-altitude nuclear explosion could cause a multistate electric outage but not the nationwide, monthslong blackout some observers have warned of. The EPRI report focused on the grid and transformers and did not examine potential impacts on generation. (See “NERC Task Force to Build on EPRI EMP Study,” NERC Standards News Briefs: May 8-9, 2019.)

“As we knew this report was coming out, we decided we needed to get a better understanding of how EMPs could affect our grid and if there were any potential actions that needed to be taken,” Gugel said. “So we reached out to the trade organizations to ask for a small representative number of individuals who had some expertise in the area that could look through the report and determine if there were any immediate actions that needed to be taken and to provide some direction.”

Gugel said the task force has not been formalized with a reporting relationship to any standing committees but that its structure could change in the future.

The task force, which is broken into three committees, will make any recommendations to the technical committees by the third quarter. Guidelines or best practices is one potential result, he said.

“Of course, everyone hates to use the dreaded SAR [standard authorization request] word. We’re certainly not jumping to any kind of standards solution,” he said. “But if, when that team is looking at that, they feel there’s something that needs to be addressed — whether it’s through our existing body of standards or a new [one] they develop — then that SAR would be presented to the Standards Committee, if applicable, in the fourth quarter of this year.

“I don’t want to raise everyone’s standards radar at this point,” he added. “I want to assure you that this is not the priority that this team is looking at.”

Supply Chain Data Request Coming

Gugel also said NERC staff are collaborating with the Supply Chain Working Group to develop a data request on supply chain cybersecurity that should be issued about July 2.

The data request is in response to a recent staff report that recommended additional study on whether low-impact systems with external routable connectivity should be covered by reliability standards. (See “Supply Chain Report Recommends Expanding Standards,” NERC Standards News Briefs: May 8-9, 2019.)

Gugel said staff drafted “strawman” questions for debate by the working group. “Any time we, as staff, try to develop something like that, we always seem to ask the wrong questions. So I’m very grateful that we get industry weighing in on this and helping us get the right questions.”

The responses will be due July 22, in time to share results with the Board of Trustees at its August meeting, Gugel said.