Search
July 30, 2025
Looking to read the full article? Scroll down and login or sign up today!
Page Reload Scroll Position
PSEG, P3 Group Appeal FERC Rulings on PJM Capacity Rules
Dec 22, 2015
PSEG and P3 had disputed PJM’s use of an 8% cost of capital used in cost of new entry calculations.
Please enter your email address (business domain required) for access.
Capacity MarketFERC & Federal
Keywordscost of new entry (CONE)D.C. Circuit Court of AppealsER13-535Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC)minimum offer price rule (MOPR)PJM Power Providers Group (P3)Public Service Enterprise Group (PSEG)
Rich Heidorn Jr.
FERC Demand Response Standards Leave Industrials, Bowring Unhappy
More From This Author →

We Recommend

1
Stakeholder Soapbox: PJM Is Flailing, but There’s a Solution
Jul 29, 2025MarketsStakeholder
2
MISO Skirts Max Gen Emergency in July Heat
Jul 29, 2025MarketsAmanda Durish Cook
3
SPP ERAS GI Requests to Begin in September
Jul 29, 2025ResourcesTom Kleckner
4
MISO Revising Transmission Futures After Repeal of Tax Credits
Jul 29, 2025FERC & FederalAmanda Durish Cook
5
Pathways Initiative Clarifies Near-term Division of Labor with CAISO
Jul 29, 2025CAISO/WEIMRobert Mullin

Popular Stories

1
PJM Capacity Prices Hit $329/MW-day Price Cap
Jul 22, 2025MarketsDevin Leith-Yessian
2
BPA Sued in 9th Circuit over Day-ahead Market Decision
Jul 10, 2025CAISO/WEIMHenrik Nilsson
3
LaCerte Nominated to Complete Phillips’ Term at FERC
Jul 17, 2025FERC & FederalKen Sands
4
N.J. Mulls PJM Withdrawal amid Energy Shortfall Predictions
Jul 8, 2025MarketsHugh Morley
5
Doubt Cast from Different Angle on Data Center Load Demand
Jul 13, 2025ResourcesJohn Cropley

Industry Gatherings


Upcoming Event

Upcoming Event

Upcoming Event