Search
April 14, 2025
Looking to read the full article? Scroll down and login or sign up today!
Page Reload Scroll Position
State Regulators Still Frustrated with PJM
© RTO Insider
Dec 17, 2018
Tension between PJM and certain states has not loosened, judging by comments made at a forum held by the Great Plains Institute and the Nicholas Institute.
Please enter your email address (business domain required) for access.
Capacity MarketConference CoveragePJM
KeywordsFederal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC)FERC Order 719Joe Bowringminimum offer price rule (MOPR)PJM Interconnection LLC (PJM)Resource-specific Carve Out (ReCO)
Michael Brooks
SCC: Dominion IRP Lacks Analysis of Nuclear Plans
More From This Author →

We Recommend

1
ERCOT Board of Directors Briefs: April 7-8, 2025
Apr 13, 2025ERCOTTom Kleckner
2
FERC Issues Order 1920-B Upholding States’ Role in Cost Allocation
Apr 13, 2025Public PolicyJames Downing
3
FERC Sustains Order Rejecting Expanded Susquehanna Co-located Load Arrangement
Apr 11, 2025FERC & FederalDevin Leith-Yessian
4
NY Energy Summit: Making the RAPID Act Live up to its Name
Apr 13, 2025NYISOJohn Cropley
5
IMM Praises MISO for Fewer Out-of-market Actions
Apr 13, 2025MarketsAmanda Durish Cook

Popular Stories

1
PJM Receives 94 Applications for Expedited Interconnection Process
Mar 26, 2025PJMDevin Leith-Yessian
2
Industry Anxiety over Grid Reliability Overblown, Panel Says
Mar 27, 2025Public PolicyK Kaufmann
3
PJM Responds to FERC Co-located Load Investigation
Mar 31, 2025TransmissionDevin Leith-Yessian
4
All 7 ISO/RTOs Send Senior Executives to Update Congress on Reliability
Mar 25, 2025MarketsJames Downing
5
Utilities Ask FERC to Toss Local Tx Planning Complaint; Others Support It
Mar 24, 2025Public PolicyJames Downing

Industry Gatherings