Search
`
November 22, 2024
Looking to read the full article? Scroll down and login or sign up today!
Page Reload Scroll Position
PJM SHs Seek End to Frequency Response Debate
Dec 7, 2018
PJM stakeholder rejected the RTO's proposal to enforce primary frequency response requirements beyond the standards of FERC Order 842.
Ancillary ServicesPJMReliability
KeywordsFERC Order 842frequency responsePJM Interconnection LLC (PJM)PJM Primary Frequency Response Senior Task Force (PFRSTF)

We Recommend

1
Consumer Advocates File Wide-ranging Complaint on PJM Capacity Market
Nov 20, 2024FERC & FederalDevin Leith-Yessian
2
CAISO Kicks off ‘Workshop’ to Update RA Mechanisms
Nov 20, 2024CAISO/WEIMAyla Burnett
3
SPP Has ‘Positive Outlook’ Heading into Winter
Nov 20, 2024ResourcesTom Kleckner
4
Texas Now Wants to be No. 1 in Nuclear Power
Nov 19, 2024ERCOTTom Kleckner
5
OMS Survey: Another 1-GW Jump in DERs in MISO Footprint
Nov 19, 2024MISOAmanda Durish Cook

Popular Stories

1
Trump’s Victory and its Implications for FERC, Power Markets
Nov 6, 2024FERC & FederalJames Downing
2
FERC Rejects Expansion of Co-located Data Center at Susquehanna Nuclear Plant
Nov 3, 2024ResourcesJames Downing
3
Rising Tensions Evident at BPA Day-ahead Markets Workshop
Nov 6, 2024CAISO/WEIMRobert Mullin
4
Chatterjee Post Leads to Worries About FERC’s Independence, Staff Exodus
Nov 11, 2024FERC & FederalJames Downing
5
FERC Dives into Data Center Co-location Debate at Technical Conference
Nov 3, 2024MarketsJames Downing

Industry Gatherings