PAR Wars: A Struggle for Power March 14, 2017 By Rory SweeneyPJM and NYISO are in a dispute over who should pay to replace a failed phase angle regulator in Ramapo, N.Y. Tell us who you are,get 2 free articles each month. What do you want to know? Want a free trial instead? Click here.Already convinced? View pricing and plans.Already a subscriber? Log in here. Additional news on this topic: PJM Submits Filing on Reactive Power PaymentsPJM last week filed Tariff revisions in response to an order by FERC requiring it take steps to prevent fleet owners from receiving reactive power payments from retired or sold generators. NYISO, PJM Discuss PARs’ Benefits, Cost AllocationStaff and stakeholders from PJM and NYISO met in New York for a nearly daylong meeting to discuss ways to evaluate the value of PARs and who should pay for them. PJM Price Forecasts: Close Enough for Power Trading?The scheduling tool that would be used to optimize power trading between PJM and NYISO is accurate within $5/MWh more than two-thirds of the time, according to a new analysis provided to members last week. Leave a Reply Cancel replyYou must be logged in to post a comment.