Five Years Later, FERC Takes Another Look at Order 1000 July 5, 2016By Rory SweeneyNearly every participant at a FERC technical conference on Order 1000 urged the commission to improve transparency in planners’ decision-making processes. Tell us who you are,get 2 free articles each month. What do you want to know?Want a free trial instead? Click here.Already convinced? View pricing and plans.Already a subscriber? Log in here. Additional news on this topic:Containment Policy: PJM Takes Up Cost CapsPJM has begun discussing the role and significance of cost-containment assurances in bids for transmission projects under FERC’s Order 1000. | © RTO InsiderFERC Rejects PJM Cost Allocation on Dominion ProjectFERC accepted PJM’s cost responsibility assignments for 33 of 34 baseline upgrades, ordering the RTO to change the billing for one Dominion project.PJM Seeks Proposals on NJ Transmission ProjectPJM yesterday announced the first transmission project open to non-utility transmission developers under the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s Order 1000. Leave a Reply Cancel replyYou must be logged in to post a comment.