FERC Rejects ISO-NE Fuel Security Tariff Revisions March 9, 2020By Michael KuserFERC rejected ISO-NE Tariff revisions to clarify that resources retained for fuel security reasons will not be retained for other reasons once the fuel security retention period ends. Tell us who you are,get 2 free articles each month. What do you want to know?Want a free trial instead? Click here.Already convinced? View pricing and plans.Already a subscriber? Log in here. Additional news on this topic:FERC Rejects $400,000 Fuel Bill from DominionFERC rejected Dominion Resources’ request to recover almost $400,000 in uncompensated costs incurred when it ran four dual-fuel units on fuel oil rather than cheaper natural gas in June.FERC Rejects ISO-NE Fuel Security Sunset RollbackFERC rejected a request by ISO-NE and NEPOOL to roll back the sunset date for a Tariff provision that allows the RTO to retain a resource for fuel security reasons.FERC Extends ISO-NE Fuel Security Filing DeadlineFERC granted ISO-NE another six months to file a long-term fuel security mechanism, the second extension since its original order last July. Leave a Reply Cancel replyYou must be logged in to post a comment.